Results found: 1

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: archaeological monument

Sort By:

Limit search:

Między teorią a praktyką. Ochrona dziedzictwa archeologicznego z perspektywy praktyki konserwatorskiej (na przykładach Delegatury w Sandomierzu Wojewódzkiego Urzędu Ochrony Zabytków w Kielcach)

100%

Florek M.

Raport

2015

vol. 10

233-261

The article discusses the legal, organizational and financial limitations which prevent the effective protection of archaeological monuments. A particular attention was devoted to the definition of archaeological monument, included in the Act on the protection and the guardianship of monuments, which seems to be too broad, as well as to the forms and manners of protection of archaeological monuments stipulated in that act, threats to them and real methods of counteracting them. In fact, the passive, reserve-type protection (preserving archaeological monuments in situ), in spite of the theoretical possibilities given in that scope in the Act on the protection and the guardianship of monuments, is very difficult to execute and can only be implemented in some cases. The basic form is active protection – rescue surveys conducted in advance. An issue in that scope are the provisions of the law, which clearly define the rules of financing only the rescue surveys which are carried out on sites threatened due to construction works and earthworks and fail to regulate, for example, the financing of rescue research in case of other threats or accidental discoveries of previously unknown sites. The attention was also drawn to the issues of protection of archaeological monuments which result from the unclear provisions of the Act on the protection and the guardianship of monuments and its inconsistency with other laws.

Refine search results

1 Raport

1 Florek M.

1 2015

Search results

Między teorią a praktyką. Ochrona dziedzictwa archeologicznego z perspektywy praktyki konserwatorskiej (na przykładach Delegatury w Sandomierzu Wojewódzkiego Urzędu Ochrony Zabytków w Kielcach)