Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  architectural competition
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Konkurs na kościół katolicki pw. św. Stanisława Kostki w Łodzi i związane z nim polemiki. „Swoi” kontra „obcy”

100%
Stefański K.
Sacrum et Decorum. Materiały i studia z historii sztuki sakralnej
|
2017
|
vol. 10
87-103
PL
Konkurs z 1898 roku na kościół katolicki pod wezwaniem św. Stanisława Kostki w Łodzi (dziś bazylika archikatedralna) należał do wyjątkowych pod wieloma względami. Był to pierwszy międzynarodowy konkurs w tym mieście i jeden z największych – gdy idzie o liczbę nadesłanych projektów – na ziemiach polskich do wybuchu pierwszej wojny światowej. Dla Łodzi i jej katolickiej społeczności miał wielkie znaczenie, a jego przebieg dokładnie relacjonowała lokalna prasa. Pierwszą nagrodę otrzymała praca zgłoszona przez łódzkie biuro budowlano-architektoniczne „Wende i Zarske”, drugą projekt I.A. Rüppela z firmy „Franz Langenberg Nachfolger” z Bonn, a trzecią spółka Stanisław Jan Cichorski i Edgar Vinson z Paryża. Zwycięska praca była ostro atakowana przez redaktora naczelnego łódzkiej gazety „Rozwój” Wiktora Czajewskiego, który promował propozycję Cichorskiego i Vinsona. Jednym z argumentów przeciwko zwycięskiemu projektowi był fakt, że jego właściwym autorem był berliński architekt Emil Zillmann. Pomimo to koncepcja firmy „Wende i Zarske” została (ze zmianami) zrealizowana w latach 1901–1912 (zwieńczenie wieży według projektu Józefa Kabana, 1927).
EN
The competition in 1898 for the Stanisław Kostka Catholic Church in Łódź (today the Cathedral Basilica) was exceptional in many ways. It was the first international competition in this city and one of the biggest – in terms of the number of designs sent – on Polish lands since the start of World War I. For Łódź and its Catholic community it was very important, and the way it was conducted was precisely reported by the local press. The first prize went to the work submitted by the Łódź construction-architecture company “Wende & Zarske”, the second prize went to I.A. Rüppel “Franz Langenberg Nachfolger” from Bonn, and the third went to the company of Stanisław Jan Cichorski and Edgar Vinson from Paris. The winning paper was sharply attacked by the chief editor of the Łódź daily Rozwój – Wiktor Czajewski, who promoted the proposition by Cichorski and Vinson. One of the arguments against the winning design was the fact that the actual author was an architect from Berlin, Emil Zillmann. Despite that fact, the concept of the company “Wende and Zarske” was (with amendments) executed between 1901–1912 (with the topping of the tower according to a design by Józef Kaban, 1927).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

QUALITY OF ARCHITECUTRE AND PUBLIC SPACES AS A RESULT OF COUNTRY’S PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CULTURE

100%
Kowalczyk M. W.
Journal of Education Culture and Society
|
2019
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
103-108
EN
Thesis. The quality of emerging public spaces and buildings is related to the public procurement culture of a given country. One can not count on achieving high quality public space, architecture without a democratic debate on the subject. The space, which is decided only by a small group of technocrats, the project, which is subject to only the price criterion, results in accidental solutions. Methods. The article shows the basic methods provided for by law to select public projects. Indicates the advantages and disadvantages of individual processes. It analyzes examples of appreciated realizations that arose as a result of architectural competitions. Results. Tools provided in the public procurement law, such as social debate in the form of architectural competitions build a better quality of the created space. The existence of such a link is proven by the awards granted to spaces completed under such processes. Conclusions. Projects created using these tools account for less than 1% of all public procurement in Poland. One should strive for a change that would promote these processes, especially outside large cities, thus increasing the quality of spaces created from public money.
3
Content available remote

Lukiškių Aikštė - Socialinio Užsakymo Evoliucija. Paminklas Laisvės Kovų Dalyviams AR Simbolis "Laisvė"?

61%
Vyšniūnas A.
Town Planning and Architecture
|
2008
|
vol. 32
|
issue 4
201-220
LT
2008 m. paskelbtas Lukiškių aikštės sutvarkymo ir simbolio "Laisvė" projekto sukūrimo konkursas. Vertinimo komisija išrinko 7 geriausius konkursinius projektus. Šie rezultatai sukėlė daug diskusijų, nes neaišku, ar tikrai pasiektas pagrindinis konkurso tikslas - įprasminti Laisvės kovas ir pagerbti tų kovų dalyvių atminimą? Nors yra labai konkretus LR Seimo nutarimas "Dėl Lukiškių aikštės funkcijų", vis tiek lieka neaiškus Lukiškių aikštės statusas: ar ji yra valstybinio rango aikštė, ar paprasta vieša savivaldybės erdvė? Kai neaiškus aikštės statusas, neaiškus ir tikslo realizavimo mechanizmas bei priemonės. Straispnyje apžvelgiami pagrindiniai Lukiškių aikštės urbanistinės plėtros etapai, įvertinant ne tik realizacijas, bet ir visas idėjas, profesines koncepcijas. Pagrindinis straipsnio tikslas - atskleisti Lukiškių aikštės formavimo mechanizmus, bet ne komentuoti atskirus meninius pasiūlymus. Straipsnyje nekomentuojami atskirų suinteresuotų socialinių ir politinių grupių pareiškimai, taip pat tariamai moksliniai pranešimai viešųjų ryšių renginiuose ir akcijose. Taip pat nediskutuojama apie grynojo meno paskirtį ir santykį su mokslu ir politika. Išvadose pateikiami Lukiškių aikštės urbanistinio formavimo ir paminklo Laisvės kovotojams statymo principai.
EN
This paper is about public spirit, national monuments and a sign system in Lukiškės Square in Vilnius. Such a system is a part of national Policy, therefore,one should keep distinct the pure artistical and national identity ideas.Nowadays a sense of national pride is very important and at the same time a real problem in Lithuania.A nation always has an essential place, a system of symbols or an extraordinary monument. Lithuania is only getting ready toconsider the issue of monuments and signs in all its aspects. That is why, according to the rules of Lukiškės Square architectural competition, it is demanded to solve this problem. A representative function is required."The memory of an unknown partisan and fighter for Lithuania's freedom will be memorialized"a slogan incused on a stone panel proclaims in Lukiškės Square. But there are still no results.The conception ofpublic spaceis unidentified, so an urban space and ordinary functional aspects are always muddled up.West European public space practice indicates that Renaissance squares are the most popular, multifunctional public spaces.The space system and nominal space hierarchy are very complicated and indefinite, therefore, the final result is under different interpretations. Memorialization of dedication to fighters for Lithuania's freedom is of great importance, but practical square formation aspects, such as parking, fountain construction, etc., are also important.The Lithuanian Parliament adopted a resolution on Lukiškės Square functions (11 Feb. 1999), but pursuancee belongs to the Municipality. That is a mistake and a real problem because the Municipality's activities are not transparent. Such problems must be solved by aSteering Committee which must be formed.Otherwise a qualitative result is impossible.In 2008 Lukiškės Square architectural competition was proclaimed. The format of the main task is double - urban and artistical aspects are declared. The result of this competition is an abstract artistical accent, but not a real representative memorial.The purpose of this work is to reveal the formation process of Lukiškės Square as the main square of Lithuania. The basic principles of the Square formation and those of erecting a monument to the Lithuanian freedom fighters are presented.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.