Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  argumentacja Pawła
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Verbum Vitae
|
2021
|
vol. 39
|
issue 1
255-280
EN
The author analyzes the Pauline pronouncement on homosexuality in Rom 1:26-27. He first places it in the context of the apostle’s arguments in Rom 1–4, outlines the structure of Rom 1:18-32, and examines the most important terms related to homosexual behavior in Rom 1:22-32. Subsequently, the author presents contemporary interpretations of Rom 1:26-27 which deconstruct or reject the Pauline critique of homosexual acts. They are divided into three basic categories: arguments from the position of modern psychology and ancient homosexual practices, arguments based on Paul’s understanding of nature, and arguments stemming from the rhetorical-literary context of Rom 1:18-32. The author critically examines these arguments, pointing to their anachronisms, limited reading of the apostle’s argumentative context, unsubstantiated overlapping of the concept of nature and cultural norm, and disregard of the universalistic character of the Pauline discourse in Rom 1:18-32.
PL
Autor analizuje Pawłową wypowiedź na temat homoseksualizmu, zawartą w Rz 1,26-27. Ukazuje ją najpierw na tle argumentacji apostoła w Rz 1–4, zarysowuje strukturę Rz 1,18-32, po czym dokonuje analizy najważniejszych pojęć związanych z grzechem natury homoseksualnej, pojawiających się w Rz 1,22-32. Następnie prezentuje współczesne interpretacje Rz 1,26-27, których przedstawiciele dekonstruują lub odrzucają Pawłową krytykę postaw homoseksualnych. Ich pozycje zostają podzielone na trzy kategorie: argumenty z pozycji współczesnej psychologii i starożytnych praktyk homoseksualnych, argumenty z rozumienia natury u Pawła oraz argumenty z kontekstu retoryczno-literackiego Rz 1,18-32. Autor krytycznie ustosunkowuje się do wymienionych argumentów, wskazując na ich anachroniczność, błędne zawężenie kontekstu argumentacyjnego apostoła, nieuprawnione zrównanie pojęcia natury z normą kulturową oraz zlekceważenie uniwersalistycznego charakteru Pawłowego dyskursu w Rz 1,18-32.
The Biblical Annals
|
2013
|
vol. 3
|
issue 2
309-338
EN
The purpose of the present article lies in finding an interpretative key for the plethora of topics exposed in 2 Cor 1–7. The author makes a review of the epistolary and oral elements present in the analyzed text, critically examines the proposals of the scholars spotting chiastic and concentric compositions in 2 Cor 1–7, and puts forward his own division of the discussed literary unit. The rhetorical dispostio model is chosen as the one which in the most adequate way describes the development of Paul’s thought in the analyzed section. In the last part of the article the author differentiates and describes the elements of the dispositio rhetorica in 2 Cor 1–7: thesis in 1,12-14; probatio in 1,15–6,10; exhortationes in 6,11–7,3, and peroratio in 7,4-16. In the first seven chapters of the 2 Corinthians Paul boasts in his apostolate, the authenticity of which is proved by selfless motivations, sufferings and Apostle’s striving for God’s glory. 2 Cor 1–7, by exposing the ethos of the Apostle, prepares his argument on the Jerusalem collection (2 Cor 8–9) and his final clash with opponents in 2 Cor 10–13.
EN
In the present article, the author indicates the theme of God’s justice as a unifying thread of the Letter to the Romans. The analysis of the issue starts from a general overview of the idea of justice in the Greco-Roman culture, in the Old and New Testament. Next, the author presents the overall structure of the Letter to the Romans supplied with the distribution of the vocabulary of justice. The core of the article is the analysis of the differentiated argumentative parts of the letter (Rom 1–4; 5–8; 9–11) with the special attention paid to the issue of God’s justice. Paul presents it as the power of God that saves the humanity from the incoming judgment (Rom 1–4), as the giver of new life in the Spirit and freedom for the believers (Rom 5–8), and as the creative will of God that will not cease until it brings everybody, including Israel, to salvation (Rom 9–11). At every stage of his argument, the apostle stresses that throughout the whole history of mankind God’s justice remained faithful to its original plan of salvation revealed and disclosed in the Old Testament.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.