Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  artistic performance
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The impulse for this paper was a controversial ruling of the Supreme Court of 10 January 201717, in which the Court refused to treat contractual work performed by a performer in an orchestra as a contract for specific work and stated that it was rather a contract for the provision of services. To justify that position, the Court found that: “The statement that the contract for a specific work was to consist in the staging and performance of a concert, makes it impossible to clearly ascertain the detailed parameters of the agreed outcome”. The Court further pointed out that: ”Adding to the fact that the interested party was one of the performers subordinated to the conductor, it is hard to conclude that the parties clearly defined the shape of the specific work in question. (...) On the contrary, this leads to a conclusion that the interested party and the remitter were bound by a contract for the provision of services”. However, the wording of the Supreme Court’s judgment should be considered erroneous as no basis therefor can be found in the knowledge and practice of performing music. Moreover, following the line of the Supreme Court’s reasoning, it turns out that a contract for specific work consisting in an artistic performance during a concert, can only be concluded if it involves creating a new piece, i.e. if it is improvised or spontaneously created. However, if a piece is not created anew and we are dealing with an artistic performance only, a contract for specified services should be concluded. And with that, one cannot agree.
PL
Przedmiotem zamówień publicznych mogą być przedmioty praw wyłącznych, o których mowa w art. 67 ust. 1 pkt b Ustawy z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych (PZP) – w tym utwory objęte uregulowaniem Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Zwykle są one przedmiotem dostawy lub usługi. Przepisy ustawy o prawie autorskim dotyczące stosunków umownych w dość szerokim zakresie modyfikują i uzupełniają zasady zawierania tych umów, wynikających z Kodeksu cywilnego. W opracowaniu wskazano wybrane problemy praktyczne, jakie mogą się pojawić przy konstruowaniu podstaw prawnych konkretnych stosunków, w tym najważniejsze odmienności uregulowania szczególnego prawa autorskiego. Ilustracją prowadzonych rozważań są przykłady umów zawieranych w ramach uregulowania dotyczącego partnerstwa innowacyjnego (art. 73h Prawa zamówień publicznych) oraz w ramach konkursów.
EN
An object of a contract awarded under public procurement procedure may be an object of exclusive rights, referred to in art. 67 sec. 1 item b of the public procurement law (PPL) including works to which copyrights and related rights act apply. Usually, they are the objects of delivery or service provision. Copyrights law regulations concerning contractual relationships quite broadly modify and supplement the rules on executing such contracts provided for in the civil code. The publication presents regulations of the copyrights act concerning execution of public contracts, featuring selected practical problems that may arise when establishing legal framework for specific legal relationships. Highlighted in the paper are major differences between specific regulations on execution of contracts that are found in copyrights law and general principles laid down in the civil code. The discussion is illustrated with examples of contracts executed under provisions on innovation partnerships (art. 73h PPL) and contract awarding competitions.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.