Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  best interests
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Leaving and Returning “Home”: The Elusive Quest for Belonging and Adulthood among African Adolescents on the Move

100%
Digidiki V., Bhabha J.
Kultura i Edukacja
|
2019
|
issue 2(124)
143-156
EN
Draconian contemporary border exclusion policies have had a devastating impact on migrants worldwide, eliciting vigorous expressions of public outrage around the world. Yet, despite growing evidence of human rights abuses as a result of these policies, States and policy makers continue to recommend more restrictive frameworks, doubling down on exclusion. Promoting a renewed “return package”, they encourage buffer and transit states to undertake “swiftreturns” of unauthorized entrants, promoting voluntary return as the preferred solution to the unwanted presence of migrants. This article discusses the consequences and implications of these policies for children. In particular, it probes the reality of distress migration for African adolescents trapped in Libya.
2
Content available remote

Czy rodzice powinni mieć prawo do decydowania o życiu i śmierci krytycznie chorych noworodków?

72%
Szewczyk K.
Diametros
|
2012
|
issue 34
154-178
PL
Tekst nawiązuje do internetowej dyskusji pt. „O racjonalne decyzje w opiece neonatalnej”, odbytej w dniach 15. 09.-15. 10. 2012 r. na stronie Polskiego Towarzystwa Bioetycznego. Uzasadniam w nim trzy postulaty: (I) propozycję zdefiniowania grupy noworodków krytycznie chorych jako pacjentów, u których niepodjęcie lub zaprzestanie leczenia przedłużającego życie będzie działaniem etycznie usprawiedliwionym, (II) objęcia tą kategorią wszystkich pięciu sytuacji wymienionych w dokumencie Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health Withholding or Withdrawing Life Sustaining Treatment in Children. A Framework for Practice z 2004 r., (III) postulat zagwarantowania rodzicom noworodków krytycznie chorych nie tylko moralnej, ale także prawnej możliwość niezgody na leczenie przedłużające życie tych dzieci.
EN
The article is a follow-up to an online debate, “On Rational Decision Making in Neonatal Care”, which was held within between 15th September and 15th October 2012 on the website of the Polish Bioethics Society. In it I provide justifications for the following three proposals: (I) the creation of a category for critically ill infants as patients in whose case withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment would be a morally justified action, (II) that this category subsume all the five cases mentioned in the document of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, entitled Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Children. A Framework for Practice (2004), and (III) that parents of critically ill infants be provided not only the moral, but also the legal possibility of refusing life-sustaining treatment.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.