Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  biblical hermeneutic
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
The Biblical Annals
|
2004
|
vol. 51
|
issue 1
127-140
PL
The author of the article sheds light on the most important aspects of the approach to the study of the biblical texts based on tradition, that is the history of the influence of the text – Wirkungsgeschichte. In the first part he shows the philosophical foundations (H-G. Gadamer) and the historical-theological origin of the method that is one more response to the shortcomings of historical-critical studies. In the next point various definitions and formulations of Wirkungsgeschichte are discussed that can be encountered in academic publications, especially written by German exegetes. The article is concluded with a critical evaluation of the approach from the point of view of Catholic hermeneutics and the theological-dogmatic principles formulated in the documents of the Catholic Church (cf. Dei Verbum 12).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Benedykta XVI hermeneutyka wiary

84%
The Biblical Annals
|
2012
|
vol. 2
|
issue 1
217-228
EN
In the “Post-synodal apostolic exhortation Verbum Domini” Pope Benedict XVI discusses the application of biblical analysis that is based on historical research and theological exegesis, considering these methodological proceedings to be the most accurate for the inspired texts. This method is usually referred to in the apostolic exhortation as a hermeneutic of faith (VD 31, 35, 38, 39, 45, 47, 52). The author explains first the hermeneutic of faith as viewed by Benedict XVI, which consists in a combination of the dominant methodological currents: historical-critical approach and theological exegesis. Then, he proceeds to discuss some fundamental criteria necessary for the analysis of the Holy Scriptures, criteria proposed in the Dogmatic Constitution Dei Verbum no. 12. The Pope often stresses the significance of the exegetical criteria in the exhortation, and makes an appeal to apply them in biblical research. The last part of the article deals with the implications of the hermeneutic of faith for the biblical methodology, with a special emphasis on the practical use of the theological exegesis. The hermeneutic of faith proposed by Benedict XVI attracts the attention of catholic biblical exegesis to the immense hermeneutical tradition of the Church, especially to the exegesis of Church Fathers, and appeals to shape Christian life according to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and to change this life into a testimony.
The Biblical Annals
|
2002
|
vol. 49
|
issue 1
15-31
PL
The author of the article discusses the most important aspects of the canonical approach in the interpretation of the Bible, which until now has been absent from Polish biblical literature. The presentation consists of four points. Firstly, historical development of canonical criticism is shown, first of all in B. S. Childs’ and J. A. Sanders’ works (1); next the most important methodological postulates of the new approach are presented: negative ones, i.e. criticism of historical-critical methodology (2), and positive ones, i.e. the most important norms of interpretation of biblical texts in the canonical approach (3). The article is concluded with a short discussion of critical and polemic opinions about B. S. Childs’ hermeneutic postulates (4). In the author’s opinion, the discussions led around the canonical approach reflect a much deeper problem that has been pervading Catholic and non-Catholic study of the Bible for years, namely, it makes exegetes realise the tension that exists between (post)positivist postulates of the historical-critical methodology and the inspired character of the biblical texts that are God’s living word. The only answer to the mentioned dichotomy may be a unanimous cooperation of the reason and faith in the domain of biblical studies (cf. John Paul II, the encyclical Fides et ratio, no 94).
PL
W niniejszym artykule autor przedstawia krytykę fundamentalistycznej hermeneutyki biblijnej autorstwa emerytowanego biskupa Kościoła Episkopalnego Stanów Zjednoczonych Johna Shelby’ego Sponga. Fundamentaliści spoglądają na Pismo Święte jak na nieomylny i bezbłędny tekst, który interpretują literalnie. Spong w swojej krytyce zwraca uwagę na ryzyka i niebezpieczeństwa, jakie niesie za sobą taka hermeneutyka biblijna i proponuje inną metodę interpretacyjną polegającą na odczytaniu tekstów biblijnych – w tym głównie tekstów Nowego Testamentu – jako hagadycznego midraszu (hebr. Midrash Rabbah).
EN
In this article the author discusses the critique of the fundamentalist biblical hermeneutic by John Shelby Spong, a retired American bishop of the Episcopal Church. Fundamentalists view Scripture as an inerrant and infallible text which is to be understood literally. In his critique Spong points to the risks and dangers of such biblical hermeneutics and suggests another interpretive method, mainly the reading of the biblical texts – particularly New Testament ones – as Midrash Rabbah.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.