Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  biblical methodology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
The Biblical Annals
|
2004
|
vol. 51
|
issue 1
127-140
PL
The author of the article sheds light on the most important aspects of the approach to the study of the biblical texts based on tradition, that is the history of the influence of the text – Wirkungsgeschichte. In the first part he shows the philosophical foundations (H-G. Gadamer) and the historical-theological origin of the method that is one more response to the shortcomings of historical-critical studies. In the next point various definitions and formulations of Wirkungsgeschichte are discussed that can be encountered in academic publications, especially written by German exegetes. The article is concluded with a critical evaluation of the approach from the point of view of Catholic hermeneutics and the theological-dogmatic principles formulated in the documents of the Catholic Church (cf. Dei Verbum 12).
The Biblical Annals
|
2002
|
vol. 49
|
issue 1
15-31
PL
The author of the article discusses the most important aspects of the canonical approach in the interpretation of the Bible, which until now has been absent from Polish biblical literature. The presentation consists of four points. Firstly, historical development of canonical criticism is shown, first of all in B. S. Childs’ and J. A. Sanders’ works (1); next the most important methodological postulates of the new approach are presented: negative ones, i.e. criticism of historical-critical methodology (2), and positive ones, i.e. the most important norms of interpretation of biblical texts in the canonical approach (3). The article is concluded with a short discussion of critical and polemic opinions about B. S. Childs’ hermeneutic postulates (4). In the author’s opinion, the discussions led around the canonical approach reflect a much deeper problem that has been pervading Catholic and non-Catholic study of the Bible for years, namely, it makes exegetes realise the tension that exists between (post)positivist postulates of the historical-critical methodology and the inspired character of the biblical texts that are God’s living word. The only answer to the mentioned dichotomy may be a unanimous cooperation of the reason and faith in the domain of biblical studies (cf. John Paul II, the encyclical Fides et ratio, no 94).
The Biblical Annals
|
2011
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
143-155
EN
The author of the article deals with the comparative method in biblical exegesis. First he critically evaluates the results of the application of this method together with its principles and goals. In the second part of the article he analyzes the semantic range of the fundamental terms and opinions of different authors concerning the principles of religiohistorical comparison; then there follows his own conclusions concerning the application of the method. Finally, the author attempts to formulate his own description of the comparative method in biblical exegesis.
EN
The article aims to analyze the present status quo of the biblical hermeneutics and exegesis in the frame of the postmodern culture. The author first defines the meaning of the terms included in the title of the article. Then postmodernism as a cultural and a philosophical currant is analyzed. On this background the author shows the threads and benefits of biblical hermeneutics and exegesis related to theories and practical implements of the postmodern ideas in the contemporary culture. Finally the answer to the question "Is it possible to reconcile the historical-critical and postmodern interpretation of the Bible?" is sought.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.