Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  causal relation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Logic and Logical Philosophy
|
2014
|
vol. 23
|
issue 4
403–448
EN
The first part of the paper_ outlines the development of causality in Greek philosophy. Some remarks are made on how some medieval philosophers approached to the problem. The paper shows also how modern philosophy understood causation. The paper inquires into the characteristics of causal relation as it is accepted in the domain of modern and recent physics. In the second part of the paper one finds some remarks concerning the programme of construing a new system CI of logic of causal propositions. This system is adequate to the manner in which causality is presented in physics. The system CI is being construed to characterize the connective of relativistic conditionals ‘$\rightsquigarrow$’ by means of the methods of recent logic. This connective should be read as follows: ‘if …, then for that reason …’. The arguments of the connective ‘$\rightsquigarrow$’ may be propositional formulas describing a particular event. The new system of non-classical logic is based on the classical propositional calculus, on the one of systems of temporal logic, and on a system ZI of logic of change. The findings concerning causation, as outlined in the first part of the paper, constitute descriptive semantics of the system CI presented in the second part of the paper. This system may play a positive role in the indirect justification of theorems in philosophy in a broad sense.
EN
This paper surveys selected (though arguably representative) versions of metaphysicaland epistemological disjunctivism. Although they share a common logicalstructure, it is hard to find a further common denominator among them. Two mainconclusions are: (1) a specific standpoint on the nature of perceptual relation is notsuch a common denominator, which means that it is very unlikely that all of theseviews could be refuted with a single objection; (2) contrary to what its name suggests,disjunctivism can be correctly expressed without the employment of disjunction.
EN
This article considers Jakub Banasiak’s book, published two years ago. Banasiak describes the nominalization processes in sentences expressing a causal relation drawing on material from the Polish and Bulgarian languages that are interesting for Bulgarists and Slavists. In addition to the examples presented in the monograph and their discussion, the theoretical considerations are noteworthy, and constitute a reminder and introduction to the practical part.
PL
Tekst dotyczy wydanej przed dwoma laty książki Jakuba Banasiaka. W książce Jakub Banasiak opisuje interesujące dla bułgarystów, i slawistów w ogóle, procesy nominalizacyjne w określonych zdaniach wyrażających relację przyczynowo-skutkową. Poza prezentowanymi w monografii przykładami oraz ich omówieniem warte uwagi są rozważania teoretyczne, będące niejako przypomnieniem i wprowadzeniem do części praktycznej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.