Results found: 1

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: coexistence of opposites

Sort By:

Limit search:

René Girarda mimetyczna rywalizacja: oksymoron czy postawa hybrydyczna

100%

Mamzer H.

Rocznik Antropologii Historii

2013

issue 2(5), Genealogie kultury

83–96

Mimetic rivalry is, contrary to appearances, not an oxymoron, as it would seem from the perspective of a modern researcher, but a hybrid attitude. Mimesis, meaning imitation, or identification of the imitator with the imitated, remains closely connected with the so-called mimesis of appropriation, which according to Girard transforms itself into pure antagonism. The resulting agonistic attitude (rivalry, competition) becomes a source of violence on the one hand, and a source of improvement or even self-creation on the other. It expresses a way of thinking characteristic of societies with magical culture, manifesting itself in an antinomy of concepts, opposing attitudes coming together to create one whole. The problem can be most clearly illustrated by the identity of opposites, known in the world of ancient concepts, especially in ancient Greece. Heraclitus’ unity of opposites is particularly relevant here; it contains two opposing attitudes, whose hybridism meant a violation of long-established moral, ethical, and religious – i.e. cultural – norms, creating an opposition towards everything that is positive, effective. It ensured a sense of balance, stability, and security within the cultural community.

Refine search results

1 Rocznik Antropologii Historii

1 Mamzer H.

1 2013

Search results

René Girarda mimetyczna rywalizacja: oksymoron czy postawa hybrydyczna