Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  cognitive styles
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The present research investigated the influences of emotional mood states on cognitive processes and neural circuits during long-term memory encoding using event-related potentials (ERPs). We assessed whether the subsequent memory effect (SME), an electrophysiological index of successful memory encoding, varies as a function of participants' current mood state. ERPs were recorded while participants in good or bad mood states were presented with words that had to be memorized for subsequent recall. In contrast to participants in bad mood, participants in good mood most frequently applied elaborative encoding styles. At the neurophysiological level, ERP analyses showed that potentials to subsequently recalled words were more positive than to forgotten words at central electrodes in the time interval of 500-650 ms after stimulus onset (SME). At fronto-central electrodes, a polarity-reversed SME was obtained. The strongest modulations of the SME by participants' mood state were obtained at fronto-temporal electrodes. These differences in the scalp topography of the SME suggest that successful recall relies on partially separable neural circuits for good and bad mood states. The results are consistent with theoretical accounts of the interface between emotion and cognition that propose mood-dependent cognitive styles.
EN
The article presents findings of the research on the diagnosis of student types and strategies and techniques of learning preferred by students with very good performance in learning, as well as those with learning disabilities and special educational needs (SEN). Research reveals the occurrence of certain regularities in individual student groups. Students with high learning outcomes are primarily of an intellectual type and prefer visual learning strategies, whereas students with learning disabilities are of an emotional, acting and cooperating type, their learning based on auditory and kinesthetic strategies. Students with special educational needs are of an emotional type. Hence, they most often use auditory and visual learning strategies. In the individual groups, there a marked correlation was observed between the student types and professional preferences. The intellectual type (students with high scores) would like to engage in occupations related to intellectual and artistic work in the future; the emotional, acting and cooperating type (children with learning difficulties) is interested in performing service professions, while the emotional type (students with special educational needs) sees their future in counselling professions.
EN
The organization of human cognitive styles can be described as a kind of functional system or as an holon. In this framework it is possible to propose a new theoretical base for classifying the primary cognitive styles. The fundamental theoretical thesis is that for all styles there is one common mechanism of forming and scanning the perceptual and memory field induced by the situation, and by the differences in the manner of carrying out the processes of field scanning /codes interfering depend on the range of conceptual equivalency and cognitive control of behavior. In the functional describing of the basic set of cognitive styles we must take into account three elements of the chain: neurobiological modules -> organization of cognitive holon -> behavioral manifestation of styles.
PL
Artykuł prezentuje wstępną weryfikację dwóch narzędzi do mierzenia stylu analitycznego przetwarzania informacji: testu Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) Fredericka i zadań Base-Rate Tasks (BRT) Kahnemana i Tversky’ego. Przeprowadzono analizę rzetelności testów, wstępnie sprawdzono trafność, szukając korelacji wyników z wynikami innych narzędzi do pomiaru indywidualnych właściwości funkcjonowania poznawczego, a także różnic między płciami i różnic związanych z kierunkiem studiów. W badaniach wzięło udział 374 studentów, w tym 174 mężczyzn i 200 kobiet reprezentujących różne kierunki studiów. Uzyskane wyniki potwierdziły rzetelność narzędzi (CRT: α-Cronbacha = 0,74; BRT: α-Cronbacha = 0,80). Związek wyników z wynikami innego narzędzia mierzącego styl analityczny – kwestionariusza Intuicyjność–Racjonalność – okazał się słaby. Uzyskane dane okazały się podobne do tych z badań Pennycooka, Cheyne’a, Seliego, Koehlera, Fugelsanga (2012), co przemawia za poprawnością adaptacji testów. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych analiz wykazano różnice między płciami (większe nasilenie stylu analitycznego u mężczyzn), a także różnice związane z wyborem studiów (większe nasilenie stylu analitycznego u studentów nauk technicznych i kierunku psychologia).
EN
The article presents preliminary verification of two instruments measuring the analytical style of information processing: Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) by Frederick and Base-Rate Tasks (BRT) test by Kahneman and Tversky. The tests’ reliability was analysed, and their validity was preliminarily verified by looking for correlations of their results with the results of other instruments measuring individual characteristics of cognitive functioning, as well as differences between sexes and differences related to the course of study. The participants were 374 students, including 174 males and 200 females representing different faculties. The obtained results confirmed the instruments’ reliability (CRT: Cronbach’s α = 0.74; BRT: Cronbach’s α = 0.80). The results’ correlation with the results of another instrument measuring the analytical style – the Intuitiveness–Rationality (IR) questionnaire – was weak. The obtained data were similar to those found in the research by Pennycook, Cheyne, Seli, Koehler and Fugelsang (2012), which proves the correct adaptation of the tests. Based on the conducted analysis, differences between sexes were shown (stronger analytical style was found in males), as well as differences connected with the choice of university course (stronger analytical style was found in students of technical sciences and psychology).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.