Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  collective guilt
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Group-based emotions are experienced by individuals when they categorize themselves as group members and interpret events from the group’s perspective. In our review, we introduce two major paradigms: intergroup emotions theory and collective emotions theory. Intergroup emotions theory borrows broadly from appraisal theories of emotion, and social identity and self-categorization theory. We review the criteria of IET and the emotions which are studies in the frame of the theory. Two problems are given special attention: the identification-guilt/negative emotions paradox, and the functionality of group-based emotions. Collective emotions theory deals with emotions which are crucial to establish both individual and group identity and link the past to the present. At the end of the paper, the concepts of collective guilt, collective shame and historical trajectory related emotions are introduced.
EN
The German community in Hungary suffered many blows at the end of World War II and after it, on the basis of collective guilt. Immediately after the Red Army had marched in. gathering and deportation started into the camps of the Soviet Union, primarily into forced-labour camps in Donetsk, the Caucasus, and the Ural mountains. One third of them never returned. Those left behind had to face forced resettlement, the confiscation of their properties, and other ordeals. Their history was a taboo subject until the change of the political system in 1989. Not even until our days, by the 70th anniversary of the events, has their story reached a worthy place in national and international remembrance. International collaboration, the establishment of a research institute is needed to set to rights in history the story of the ordeal of the German community after World War II. for the present and future generations
EN
In his paper, Gyorgy Dupka deals with the tragic fate of the Transcarpathian Hungarians and Germans deported for ‘a three-day labour’ in the period of 1944-1946. During the past twenty years, he succeeded in collecting and, in some measure, publicizing sufficient archival materials to open up the facts of the anomies committed by the Soviet military authorities in the fall of 1944 and at the beginning of 1945. All these facts are supported by cogent data and concrete names of the perpetrators. In his paper, the author shows primarily how in the light of the reports conceived by the NKVD and other Soviet central military administrations Order 0036 of the Military Council of the 4th Ukrainian Front was carried into effect.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy winy jako pojęcia z pogranicza prawa i filozofii. Swoje rozważania wyprowadzam z wykładów pt. Problem winy Karla Jaspersa, który wypracował rozróżnienie czterech rodzajów winy: kryminalnej, politycznej, moralnej i metafizycznej. Podział ten został przez niego przeprowadzony zaraz po II wojnie światowej, w trakcie procesów norymberskich, gdy problem winy niemieckiej był szeroko dyskutowany – zarówno przez aliantów, zwycięzców, jak i w społeczeństwie niemieckim. Na powyższe rozróżnienie nakładają się ponadto kwestie winy zbiorowej i indywidualnej. Klarowna dystynkcja ma na celu, wedle słów filozofa, pomóc w wyjaśnieniu rozpatrywanych kwestii i dojściu do prawdy. Moim zadaniem w niniejszym tekście było zreferowanie teorii winy Karla Jaspersa, próba wyjaśnienia niejednoznacznych jej fragmentów, polemika z zarzutami jej stawianymi oraz próba aplikacji tejże teorii na potrzeby prawniczej dyskusji o lustracji w Polsce.
EN
This article concerns guilt as a concept which lies at the intersection of law and philosophy. My reflections are founded on Karl Jaspers’ lectures entitled The Question of German Guilt. Jaspers distinguished four types of guilt: criminal, political, moral, and metaphysical. This distinction was made immediately after the Second World War, during the Nuremberg trials, when the problem of the German guilt was widely debated – both by the Allies, the victors, and in the German society. What is superimposed on this distinction is the issues of collective and individual guilt. A clear demarcation was intended (according to the philosopher himself) to clarify these issues and to come to the truth. My task in this text was to present Karl Jaspers’ guilt theory, to explain its ambiguous fragments, to challenge the objections against this theory, and to attempt to apply it to the Polish discussion about lustration.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.