Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  collective responsibility
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Neighborhood watch or citizens watch is a very essential and very effective way of fighting and preventing various crimes. The forms of implementing these ideas vary depending on a country and characteristics of a given society or a particular group. However there are plenty solutions that can be implemented universally without any special training or founds. In this article we shall introduce some samples of neighborhood watch activities as seen in contemporary Japan, consider cultural and social background of such movements and suggest some reasons, why these, quite simple ideas, are worth introducing in other countries, where they should also work helping to make law enforcement forces’ tasks easier and their efforts more effective.In the article we shall also explain that for this kind of crime prevention activities it is necessary to educate any given society on their own responsibilities and various kinds of ways that they can get involved in the very task of making their neighborhoods safer and friendlier. Once citizens are aware of the effectiveness of their own actions and the support they can get from the police, they should be happy to try any proven ways of neighborhood watch or develop new, suitable for their particular needs and conditions, ways of making their environment safer.
EN
In the article I will pay attention to schools as Professional Learning Communities which include: shared values and vision of education, collective responsibility, reflective professional inquiry, collaboration and group, as well as individual, learning. I also analyze trust and respect, closely related to PLC in contemporary Finnish education.
EN
Improving competitiveness of organizations necessary for their success in a market economy is no longer possible only due to material resources. This implies need for qualitatively new approach to human capital. The author reviews approaches to team building and suggests team management model based on situations-cases in which the organized one way or another team reaches goal.
PL
Głównym celem artykułu była próba sproblematyzowania fenomenu odpowiedzialności bytu zbiorowego. Zadanie to okazało się wielce złożone ze względu na obowiązujące, a właściwie dominujące powszechnie przekonanie (w świadomości prawno-polityczno-gospodarczej) o absolutnej fundamentalności odpowiedzialności jednostkowej, zamykające jakąkolwiek refleksję nad odpowiedzialnością bytu zbiorowego, która to refleksja mogłaby zniszczyć jedno z najcenniejszych osiągnięć ludzkiej myśli, jaką jest niewątpliwie idea odpowiedzialności moralnej bytu ludzkiego. Z drugiej jednak strony zmiany następujące z coraz większą gwałtownością zarówno w charakterze oraz strukturze społeczeństw, jak i relacjach społecznych, stanowiących o nowym jego obliczu, wskazują, że przy wzrastającej sile oddziaływania mocy sprawczej wielkich organizacji (zarówno tych publicznych, jak i prywatnych) nie sposób dzisiaj nie podjąć refleksji nad nowym wymiarem odpowiedzialności, tj. odpowiedzialności bytu zbiorowego. Artykuł jest zatem próbą pokazania kierunków poszukiwań nowego zjawiska, przy założeniu nienaruszalności fenomenu odpowiedzialności jednostkowej.
EN
The main objective of the paper is to address the problem of responsibility of a collective being. This task has proven to be very complex due to the conviction which is currently dominant (in legal, political and economic consciousness): that of absolutely fundamental individual responsibility that closes any reflection on the responsibility of a collective being which could destroy one of the undoubtedly most valuable achievements of human thought: the idea of moral responsibility of a human being. However, the increasingly rapid changes both in the nature and structure of societies, and in social relations, which are its new face, show that with the increasing impact and power of large organizations (public and private alike), one has to reflect on a new dimension of responsibility, i.e. the responsibility of a collective being. The paper is therefore an attempt to show research directions of the new phenomenon, without questioning the inviolability of individual responsibility.
PL
W związku z tym, że w filozofii współczesnej fenomen odpowiedzialności nabiera coraz istotniejszego znaczenia, autorka postanowiła przyjrzeć się jego rozumieniu w kontekście myśli liberalnej i komunitariańskiej. Artykuł jest zatem próbą porównania fenomenu odpowiedzialności w ujęciu liberałów oraz komunitarian. Zawarte w tekście rozważania prowadzą autorkę do wniosku, iż oba te stanowiska odmiennie postrzegają fenomen odpowiedzialności; liberalizm, koncentrując się nieomal wyłącznie na jego jednostkowym rozumieniu, podczas kiedy w ramach myśli komunitariańskiej otwiera się przestrzeń do jego rozumienia w ujęciu wspólnotowym.
EN
Due to the fact that in contemporary philosophy phenomenon of responsibility is becoming more significant meaning the author decided to look at its meaning in the context of liberal thought and comunitarin. The article is thus an attempt to compare the phenomenon of responsibility in terms of the liberals and communitarians. Included in the text the author considerations lead to the conclusion that both these positions differently perceive the phenomenon of responsibility, liberalism focusing almost exclusively about his understanding of the individual, while in the framework of comunitarian’s thought opens up space for its understanding in terms of the community.
EN
Description of the man creation and following after it description of the fall shows that the man is the ethical creature and is subject to a moral rights. It arises the responsibility. The crime is subject to the punishment, and obedience will be awarded. In the history of the biblical revelation comes first of all the notion of the collective responsibility which loses its part of the translation of events experienced by the nation in the voice first it Babylonian constrains. Then comes to the voice the notion of the personal responsibility which lets every individual participate in supporting the religious relation to the God but it gives also a serious difficulties. The Book of Job undertakes the problem of the suffering fair, the Book of Kohelet the question, why unfair does not bear punishment. The fuller possible solution is just after understanding that the repayment does not end within the earthly life, but there is the place for it in the hereafter life. It becomes the call to undertaking responsibility connected with the hope full of the responsibility.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.