Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  common foreign and security policy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Parlament Europejski a wysoki przedstawiciel Unii do spraw zagranicznych i polityki bezpieczeństwa. Wybrane zagadnienia

100%
Dubowski T.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2020
|
issue 4(159)
9-29
EN
The European Parliament is an institution with clearly limited competences in the area of the Union’s common foreign and security policy. However, this does not mean that it is separated from the policy in question. While the European Parliament does not in fact have any decision-making powers in the field of foreign and security policy, some organizational links with this area can be seen. They also include links with the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, which have been made the subject matter of this article. The aim of the presented considerations is to identify and analyze the main formal mechanisms of the potential and actual influence of the EP on the office of the High Representative as the body responsible for programming and implementing the common foreign and security policy. In this context, the questions of the EP’s influence on the appointment and termination of the term of office of the High Representative, his information and consultation obligations towards the Parliament and the possibility of using EP’s legislative powers in its relations with the High Representative were analyzed.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Norway’s Attitudes to European Integration Within Foreign Policy: Dilemmas of Non-EU European States in the Light of Developing the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy

75%
Koba P.
Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations
|
2020
|
vol. 56
|
issue 1
25-38
EN
Taking Norway as an example and a point of departure, this article looks at the ways in which the EFTA countries tackled dilemmas connected with the necessity to safeguard their interests in foreign policy against the background of the developing integration in foreign policy between the EC and, later, the EU members. The author argues that Norway, as a non-EU European country, consistently pursued a strategy typical for a ‘small country’ of the Nordic region vis-à-vis the ongoing integration of the EC/EU in the area of foreign affairs. After the end of the Cold War, Norway faced a potential threat of declining interest of the transatlantic community and the NATO in the Northern area. The EU enlargement in 1995 considerably limited the possibilities for Norway to coordinate foreign policy with other Nordic countries. For these reasons, Norway supported the development of the EU’s CFSP/CSDP as a tool complementary to the NATO in order to enhance its security. Institutionally, it chose a pragmatic model of selected approximation to the EU’s foreign and defence policy, especially for political dialogue, declarations, sanctions, as well as the CDSP’s civilian and military operations.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Udział Polski w operacjach wojskowych Unii Europejskiej w Afryce

71%
Przybylska-Maszner B.
Przegląd Politologiczny
|
2016
|
issue 3
7-26
EN
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the conditions behind Polish participation in the European Union’s military operations in Africa. The author attempts to describe the evolution of the Polish position on the concept of the Common Security and Defence Policy. The text presents the Polish experiences, gained during operations, and assessments of the outcomes of Polish involvement, against the declared priorities of Polish foreign policy. The author also points out the main causes of changes in the Polish stance against further involvement on the African continent. She draws attention to the transformations within the EU and their reception by the Polish government.
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza uwarunkowań udziału Polski w afrykańskich operacjach wojskowych Unii Europejskiej na tle ewolucji polskiego stanowiska wobec koncepcji realizacji Wspólnej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony. W tekście przedstawiono polskie doświadczenia z udziału w operacjach, a także ocenę jego konsekwencji w odniesieniu do deklarowanych priorytetów polskiej polityki zagranicznej. Autorka wskazuje także na główne przyczyny zmiany stanowiska polskiego wobec dalszego zaangażowania na kontynencie afrykańskim. Zwraca uwagę na przekształcenia wewnątrz Unii oraz ich odbiór przez stronę polską.
4
Content available remote

Debata nad nową strategią bezpieczeństwa zewnętrznego na forum instytucji i organów Unii Europejskiej w latach 2012-2015

63%
Węc J. J.
Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
|
2016
|
issue 41
211-236
EN
The subject of the article is the debate on the new external security strategy, which has been ongoing in the European Union since 2012. It presents the position of the European Council and the Council for Foreign Affairs, the European Commission, the European Parliament as well as the Interparliamentary Conference for a Common Foreign and Security Policy and Common Security and Defence Policy. In so far as these first two institutions play a decisive role in shaping a common security and defence policy, the influence of the next two is still limited, in spite of the fact that it has increased since the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty of 13 December 2007. In turn, the Interparliamentary Conference, whose members include representatives of the European Parliament and national parliaments, functions only as an advisory body in this area.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.