Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  compensation for non-material damage
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Polish civil code does not includes regulation of compensation of a non-material damage, that arise of non-performance or improper performance of a contract. On a basis of EU consumer regulations, Court of Justice of the European Union made a judgement on March 12th 2003, resolving that damage incurred by a consumer should be comprehended broadly, including non-material damage, like a loss of enjoyment of the holiday. That decision opened a discussion in Polish jurisprudence, according to possibilities of compensation of non-material damage on a base of ex contractu regulations, especially on Article 11a of Polish Tourist Services Act. Dissemination of contracts aimed at satisfying of non-material interests of consumer makes the problem significant. Similar problems occur in regard to non-material damages caused by improper providing of medical services. Doubts arising of the lack of clear regulations allowing a claim for compensation of non-material damages combined with principle of loyalty in EU laws, lead to expressing of legislation proposals. Postulate of rational legislator and the necessity of EU-friendly interpretation leads to conclusion, that accordance of Article 471 of Polish civil code is fully justified as a base of compensation of non-material damage arising of contract obligations.
EN
The GDPR celebrated its sixth birthday this year. However, this certainly does not mean that all questions related to its application have been answered. One of the unanswered questions so far has been the interpretation of the conditions for the right to compensation for non-material damage caused by a breach of the Regulation. The Court of Justice has recently changed that with its first answers to the preliminary questions referred by the Austrian Supreme Court. The article presents the legal framework of the GDPR on compensation for non-material damage and then focuses on the Court’s judgment, starting with a description of the facts of the case, the Advocate General’s opinion and an analysis of the Court’s conclusions themselves.
CS
Nařízení GDPR oslavilo v letošním roce již šesté narozeniny své účinnosti. To však rozhodně neznamená, že již došlo k zodpovězení všech otázek spojených s jeho aplikací. Jednou z takových nezodpovězených otázek doposud zůstával výklad podmínek pro přiznání práva na náhradu nehmotné újmy způsobené porušením nařízení. To nedávno změnil Soudní dvůr prvními odpověďmi na předběžné otázky položené rakouským nejvyšším soudem. Článek představuje právní rámec nařízení GDPR ohledně náhrady nehmotné újmy a dále je zaměřen na rozsudek Soudního dvora, počínaje popisem skutkových okolností případu, přes stanovisko generálního advokáta až po rozbor jeho samotných závěrů.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.