Search results

1

The Notion of “Court” under the Succession Regulation

100%

Wilderspin M.

Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego

|

2020

45-56

PL

The article concerns the notion of “court” in the Succession Regulation. This notion is used in the Brussels I and Brussels Ia Regulations, where it does not necessarily have the same scope. The author attempts to interpret the concept in the light of the recitals to the Succession Regulation (in particular Recital 20) and of the case law of the Court of Justice. The very general description of the concept contained in Article 3(2) of the Regulation might potentially embrace other authorities and legal professionals, where they exercise judicial functions by way of delegation of power from the court. In the author’s view, the European Court, especially in Oberle and WB v Notariusz Przemysława Bac correctly navigated its way through the Succession Regulation and ruled in a way which is both coherent as regards the operation of the Regulation and consistent with the intentions of the legislator. The above judgments are analysed also with regard to Poland’s omission to notify notaries as “courts” under Article 79 of the Succession Regulation. The European Court found that the criteria for determining whether an authority or a legal professional, in particular a notary public, constitutes a “court” aredetermined by Article 3(2) and not by Article 79. Consequently, Poland’s omission to notify was not conclusive, but was in any event correct in substance. The author expresses the opinion that the judgment is accurate on this point.

2

Powierzenie urzędu kanclerza kurii diecezjalnej

71%

Kaszak R.

Kościół i Prawo

|

2014

|

issue 3 (16) nr 2

53-66

EN

The chancellor of diocesan curia is an obligatory office established by the universal law. The competent authority for provision chancellor office is a diocesan bishop and those who are equivalent in law to a diocesan bishop. Office of the chancellor may be exercised by a lay person. The chancellor must be of unimpaired reputation and above all suspicion. The definitive judgment concerning the suitability of the candidate for the chancellor pertains to the diocesan bishop. He is not obliged to obtain consent or counsel of college or group of persons. Decree of appointment, in accordance with the law notified, is the central moment of provision the office of chancellor of the diocesan curia.

3

The Efficacy of Dispensations Granted Without a Just Cause and under the Influence of Error, Deceit and Force

71%

Ogutu J. O.

Roczniki Nauk Prawnych

|

2023

|

vol. 33

|

issue 4

99-130

PL

Dyspensa jest jedną z podstawowych instytucji typowych dla prawa kościelnego, a doktryna kanoniczna zdefiniowała ją bardzo precyzyjnie. Ewoluowała w ramach systemu kanonicznego i jest stale modyfikowana i doskonalona przez prawodawstwo kanoniczne. Kanon 85 Kodeksu z 1983 r. definiuje tę instytucję jako pojedynczy akt administracyjny, wydany przez osoby posiadające władzę wykonawczą, którego głównym celem jest złagodzenie mocy samego prawa kościelnego w konkretnym przypadku dla duchowego dobra wiernych. Nie jest to narzędzie wymierzania sprawiedliwości, ale instrument roztropnego administrowania. Niekiedy może dochodzić do nadużyć tej instytucji kanonicznej przez same kompetentne władze lub przez podmioty ubiegające się o dyspensę. Aby pomóc ludowi Bożemu i kompetentnym władzom kościelnym docenić wartość kanonicznej instytucji dyspensy w systemie kanonicznym, autor artykułu broni idei słusznej przyczyny i ostrzega wiernych chrześcijan przed próbami uzyskania dyspensy w drodze podstępu, użycia siły lub w sytuacji ciężkiej bojaźni.

EN

Dispensation is one of the fundamental institutions which are typical of ecclesiastical law. It has been ordered and disciplined with much precision by the canonical doctrine, grown within the canonical system, and is ever modified and perfected by canonical legislations. Canon 85 of the 1983 Code defines this institution as a singular administrative act, granted by those enjoying executive power, whose main objective is to mitigate the vigor of a merely ecclesiastical law in a particular case for the spiritual benefit of the faithful. It is not an instrument of administering justice but an instrument of prudent administration. At times, there can be abuse of this canonical institution by the competent authorities themselves, or by the subjects requesting dispensation. This article, in order to help the people of God and the competent ecclesiastical authorities to appreciate the value of the canonical institution of dispensation within the canonical system, sets out to defend the need of a just cause, and to caution the Christian faithful from seeking dispensations on the basis of deceit, force or under the influence of grave fear.

Refine search results

1 Kościół i Prawo

1 Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego

1 Roczniki Nauk Prawnych

1 Kaszak R.

1 Ogutu J. O.

1 Wilderspin M.

1 2023

1 2020

1 2014

The Notion of “Court” under the Succession Regulation

Powierzenie urzędu kanclerza kurii diecezjalnej

The Efficacy of Dispensations Granted Without a Just Cause and under the Influence of Error, Deceit and Force