Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  concession contract
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The purpose of this opinion is to assess the new EU Directives reforming the EU public procurement law and the award of concession contracts. The adoption of the above‑mentioned directives concludes the more than two‑year legislative work of the EU on the new legal framework of public procurement. The author provides an analysis of the concept of “public contract” and “concession” contained in Directives 2014/23, 2014/24 and 2014/25, which clarifies the definition contained in the current EU legislation. He points out the changes introduced by the new directives, including mandatory system of administrative cooperation between Member States, with exemptions for public contracts and concessions for certain services, new procurement procedures through innovative partnerships and provisions for administrative and regulatory governance.
PL
At present, in the Polish legal system, there is a tendency towards penetrating legal institutions of different branches of law, in particular the interaction between private law and public law. Increasingly, the Polish legislator is using law transplants in its law-making activity, thus shaping the functioning of the public administration. Unfortunately, the analysis of the cases selected by the author of this publication contributes to adopting a critical attitude towards the legislative procedures currently applied by the legislator.
EN
This opinion evaluates four Deputies’ bill as to whether or not they are in conformity with three new EU directives on public procurement. The presented analysis confirms the compliance with EU law of a Deputies’ bill included contained in Sejm Paper No. 1076 and welcomes the extension of the catalog of evaluation criteria to include the criterion of innovative character of proposed solutions. The authors find the bill contained in Sejm Paper No. 1226 to be incompatible with EU law, because contrary to EU law it presupposes the primacy of the criterion of the lowest prices over other criteria. The bill included in Sejm Papers No. 1335 and No. 1635 are found partially incompatible with EU law, due to the lack of objectively justified reasons for division of public procurement into those representing functional and technical unity, as well as a violation of the principle of equal treatment and transparency.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.