Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  confirmation bias
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Ako skúmať sklon k sebapotvrdzovaniu?

100%
Vedejová D., Čavojová V.
Československá psychologie (Czechoslovak Psychology)
|
2020
|
vol. 64
|
issue 2
184-196
EN
Confirmation bias is one of the most problematic aspects of human reasoning, but there is no universal definition of this phenomenon resulting in the methodology gaps in its measurement. The aim of the study is to provide a review of relevant empirical research and classification of the methods used for measuring confirmation bias depending on the stages of the reasoning (search, interpretation, and memory recall), and identification of an effective method for its measurement. In the discussion, the prerequisites that should be met by a methodology for measuring confirmation bias are outlined: it should measure confirmation bias in searching for information, interpretation of evidence, and memory recall of information and also the attitudes to the topic being measured. The results obtained by such a method would help to clarify how the confirmation bias manifests iself at different stages of reasoning and, last but not least, would help to examine and verify whether and how can it be effectively reduced.
SK
Sklon k sebapotvrdzovaniu (confirmation bias) sa považuje za jeden z najproblematickejších aspektov ľudského usudzovania, no doteraz neexistuje jednotné vymedzenie tohto fenoménu, čo spôsobuje metodologické medzery pri jeho meraní. Cieľom štúdie je preto priniesť prehľad relevantných empirických výskumov, pokúsiť sa o klasifikáciu metód používaných na meranie sklonu k sebapotvrdzovaniu v závislosti od fáz usudzovania (vyhľadávanie, interpretácia a vybavovanie z pamäti) a identifikovať efektívny spôsob jeho merania. V závere autori poukazujú na nevyhnutné predpoklady, ktoré by mala spĺňať metodika na meranie sklonu k sebapotvrdzovaniu: mala by merať postoje k téme a zároveň sklon k sebapotvrdzovaniu vo vyhľadávaní informácií, interpretácii dôkazov a pri vybavovaní si informácií. Výsledky získané takouto metódou by pomohli objasniť, ako sa sklon k sebapotvrdzovaniu prejavuje v rôznych fázach usudzovania a v neposlednom rade by pomohli preskúmať a overiť spôsoby, či a ako sa dá efektívne redukovať.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance

88%
Padilla Cruz M.
Research in Language
|
2017
|
vol. 15
|
issue 1
11-36
EN
Noises, similarities between words, slips of the tongue, ambiguities, wrong or false beliefs, lexical deficits, inappropriate inferences, cognitive overload, non-shared knowledge, topic organisation or focusing problems, among others, may cause misunderstanding. While some of these are structural factors, others pertain to the speaker or to both the speaker and the hearer. In addition to stable factors connected with the interlocutors’ communicative abilities, cultural knowledge or patterns of thinking, other less stable factors, such as their personal relationships, psychological states or actions motivated by physiological functions, may also result in communicative problems. This paper considers a series of further factors that may eventually lead to misunderstanding, and which solely pertain to the hearer: processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The effect of metacognitive self on confirmation bias revealed in relation to community and competence

75%
Brycz H., Wyszomirska-Góra M., Bar-Tal Y., Wiśniewski P.
Polish Psychological Bulletin
|
2014
|
vol. 45
|
issue 3
306-311
EN
The main goal of our study was to investigate the role of insight into one’s own biases (metacognitive self) in the process of hypothesis validation in accordance to the two fundamental social perception domains (community and competence) on the example of confirmation bias. The study was conducted on a group of 593 participants with the use of a confirmation bias procedure, a free recall procedure and the Metacognitive Self scale. We manipulated with the domain and the value of information given to the respondents. We suspected that individuals with a high metacognitive self, in opposition to low metacognitive self ones, would not process the given information according to the two fundamental social perception domains. The results verified the existence of an interaction effect of the metacognitive self (MCS) and the domain of the information given about a perceived person on the susceptibility to follow the confirmation bias. Contrary to the low metacognitive self individuals, who show a higher tendency for the confirmation bias within the competence than the community domain, persons with a high insight into their own biases express the same level of confirmation bias in no respect to the domain of the information. The value of the information has no significant influence.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.