Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  consanguinity
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
One of the rules contained in the Code of Good Administrative Behavior adopted in 2001 by the European Parliament is the principle of impartiality and independence (Article 8). The presence of this rule, despite its non-binding nature, prompted the author to examine – using the method of comparative law analysis – whether the EU Member States have regulated this issue in their legal systems – and if so, to what extent and how. The basic institution serving the implementation of this principle is the disqualification of an employee of the authority from participation in the proceedings in situations where their impartiality seems to be at risk. Not all EU countries explicitly provide for such an institution. Among the legal systems that contain it, only some regulate the entirety of issues related to it: the grounds for disqualification, the procedure for disqualification and the consequences of it, as well as the appealability of orders taken in this matter and the consequences of violating the provisions on disqualification. Regulations of individual issues differ in the degree of detail. This applies primarily to the reasons for the disqualification of an employee of the authority. The most important reason for the disqualification of employees (except when they or their spouse are a party to the proceedings) is the consanguinity or affinity between them and the party. However, the ranges of such ties resulting in automatic disqualification of an employee, adopted in EU member states, differ significantly. The second area of significant difference is the consequences of the potentially biased employee’s participation in the proceedings. The solutions adopted in this regard in legislation and jurisprudence depend on how the main purpose of the provisions concerning the disqualification of an employee is perceived: as strengthening the public’s trust in the executive, or as a fair settlement of the matter.
EN
This article concerns the meaning of terms „consanguinity” and „affinity” and other genealogical terms. The second part of the article is dedicated to show a historical evolution of range the consanguinity and affinity as a impediments to marriage in Canon Law of Roman Catholic Church, from its source in the Law of the Bible and in the Roman Law, to 1917, when the first Code of Canon Law was published. Furthermore, in the article it is shown an influence of Canon Law on forming of impediments of consanguinity and affinity in FamilyLaw in force in Poland to the early 20th century.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy znaczenia terminów "pokrewieństwo" i "powinowactwo" oraz innych terminów genealogicznych. Druga część artykułu poświęcona jest ukazaniu historycznej ewolucji zakresu pokrewieństwa i powinowactwa jako przeszkód małżeńskich w prawie kanonicznym Kościoła rzymskokatolickiego, od jego źródeł w prawie biblijnym i rzymskim, aż do roku 1917, kiedy to ukazał się pierwszy Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego. Ponadto w artykule ukazano wpływ prawa kanonicznego na kształtowanie się przeszkód pokrewieństwa i powinowactwa w prawie rodzinnym obowiązującym w Polsce do początku XX wieku.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.