Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  constitutional tradition
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
There are two dates of particular importance for Polish collective memory, namely 11November 1918 – the day of the regaining of independence after 123 years of partitions, and 4 June 1989 – the day which started the process of Poland regaining its full internal and external sovereignty. These two turning points determine the beginnings of the respective discourses on the directions of changes in the political systems of the Second and Third Republics. This paper focuses on the discourses concerning the political systems during the periods of transition and is based on the content of The March Constitution of 1921 and The Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997. A basic law is a text of fundamental importance for any country as it establishes the principles of its organisation, regulates the functioning of its institutions and determines the position of the citizen vis-à-vis the state. It is also a testimony to various understandings of the notion of nation and to a considerable extent determines a sense of national and state community as well as citizens’ collective ememory.
EN
The paper deals with continuity and discontinuity amongst sets of rules of procedure of the former Austrian Imperial Council on the one hand and of the republican Czechoslovak, Czech and Austrian Parliaments on the other. Although Czech parliamentary law has, to a certain degree, been distorted by the communist era, a clear degree of continuity is demonstrated between the Czech Chamber of Deputies and the Austrian National Council and their procedural rules (especially in contrast to the German Bundestag). Thus, the Austrian rules of procedure can, in contrast to the rules of Bundestag, be a more suitable inspiration for a possible procedural reform in the Czech Chamber of Deputies. The common constitutional tradition of the two countries, especially in the peaceful years between 1867 and 1914, definitely remains relevant.
CS
Článek se zabývá kontinuitou a diskontinuitou mezi jednacími řády rakouské říšské rady a pozdějšími jednacími řády republikánských parlamentů československých, českých a rakouských. Ukazuje zřetelnou míru kontinuity, a tudíž i podobnosti mezi pravidly jednání české Poslanecké sněmovny a rakouské Národní rady (zejména v porovnání s německým Spolkovým sněmem), byť české parlamentní právo bylo více zasaženo komunistickou érou. Rakouský jednací řád tak může být vhodnější inspirací pro reformu jednacího řádu české Poslanecké sněmovny než jednací řád německý. Společná ústavněprávní tradice, zejména v mírových letech 1867–1914, tak rozhodně není bez významu.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.