In the paper there is presented the negative role of cognitive inhibitors in taking constructive critical attitude by primary education teachers. Among the intellectual barriers there may be distinguished: perceptive defense and interpretative fundamentalism (understood as knowledge certainty and illusion of reality), conformity and lack of flexibility, low cognitive culture and bad connotation with critics. Conducted analysis proved the hypothesis of negative correlation between low cognitive competences and interests and teachers constructive criticism.
Critical thinking in terms of psycho‐pedagogy: towards individual cognitive independence and responsibility: The paper is devoted to the methods of recognition and development of critical thinking. In the initial part synthetically are presented the views of researchers connected with an education perspective (the definition and features of critical thinking). Within this aspect crucial appears the question: why are we afraid of criticism? What are the reasons why we do not apply it in contact with the cultural message, with the opinions and actions of people? For relatively seldom is it used as a support in discussion, in making decisions and choices. In an attempt to answer such formulated problems presented is an outline of the author’s classification for inhibitors that prevent or hinder the application of critical thinking. Here the main claim is that in the modern world of news excess and the chaos of values, critical thinking as a manifestation of cognitive self‐reliance and responsibility should become the competence characterizing each individual. Hence, the author formulates some recommendations concerning pedagogical practice. They are implied from the author’s concept of constructive criticism, the adopted the principles and methods supporting critical thinking.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.