Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  contemporary economics
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the functioning of special economic zones in Aqaba, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, and Ukraine. The work gives the concept and classification of the Free trade zones (FTZ), reflects the goals of creating zones and their purpose. The main goal of the work is to study the features of FTZs in Jordan and Ukraine and determine what experience Ukraine can gain from Jordan to optimize the work of the Ukrainian FTZs. During the research we grounded that Ukraine has essential resource opportunities, such as: natural resources, working capital, and geographical location compared to Jordan, which despite of all the obstacles could implement ASEZ and gradually improve its economy. Jordanian experience proves that the desire of a strong Leader and his loyal team, despite of the concentration of hot points all around the borders, unstable political relationship with its neighbors, high refugees inflow definitely led to the deterioration of economic situation in the country. A large stock of foreign debt, insufficient supplies of water, oil, and other natural resources, high level of unemployment – succeeded in its effective implementation of ASEZ and overcame all the severities. Thus, hopefully this research might inspire the Ukrainian leaders to promote the development of Ukrainian FTZs in order to prosper our economy and improve the standard of living.
EN
Issue of incomplete employment is still a major problem of the capitalist economy, unresolved both in economic theory and in practice. The main goal of this article is to compare the position of the three great economists on this issue: Joseph Alois Schumpeter, John Maynard Keynes and John Kenneth Galbraith. The first two economists significantly differed in their views, Galbraith’s position was strongly similar to the Keynesian.
EN
The debate among economists over the scope of state intervention in economic processes has a long history. After periods in which laissez-faire theories were dominant, views that promoted the active participation of the state in economic life increasingly came to the fore. Economic theory and business practice, both subject to fluctuations, have sometimes preferred the first approach and sometimes the second. The modern state operates in an increasingly globalized, dynamic, and turbulent environment. This changeable environment, the diversity of development levels, and the emergence of new institutions urge a redefinition of its role in modern economies. This paper contributes to the debate on the challenges and economic role of modern state and identifies some of those challenges.
PL
Spór ekonomistów dotyczący zakresu interwencji państwa w procesy gospodarcze trwa od dawna. Po okresach dominacji teorii leseferystycznych następuje wzrost znaczenia nurtów promujących aktywny udział państwa w życiu gospodarczym. Teoria ekonomiczna i praktyka gospodarcza, poddawane fluktuacjom, preferują raz jedno, raz drugie podejście. Współczesne państwo działa w coraz bardziej zglobalizowanym, dynamicznym i turbulentnym otoczeniu. Konieczność redefinicji roli państwa wynika z dynamiki współczesnych procesów gospodarczych, zróżnicowania poziomów rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego czy też wyłaniania się nowych instytucji. Artykuł stanowi głos w dyskusji dotyczącej dylematów związanych z ekonomiczną rolą państwa, a także wskazuje niektóre wyzwania stające przez współczesnym państwem.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.