Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  contract for work
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Prawo
|
2015
|
issue 318
235 - 248
EN
Software development contract sensu stricto is often qualified as a contract for work. The aim of the article is to consider the relation between a bespoke computer program and work. In the conclusion of the conducted analysis it should be stated that it will not always constitute work in the sense of Art. 627 of the Civil Code. The lack of a precise description of bespoke software and the uncertainty of its realisation is an argument for the exclusion of immaterial goods from the scope of the contract for work. This last remark concerns particularly complicated computer programs, which are ordered most frequently and which are often under the copyright protection. However, simple computer programs will normally constitute the object of the contract for work.
EN
The article deals with a classification model used to distinguish between the obligations to achieve a specific result and the obligations of best efforts. Despite some theoretical reservations, this classification is commonly used both by the academics in the field of civil law and in the case law. The main goal of the article is to properly distinguish between these two types of obligations, as well as to present the consequences of such operation as regards the liability for non-performance or improper performance of an obligation. The initial part discusses the French origin of the classification and its implementation in the Polish civil law. Furthermore, it contains necessary terminological qualifications, as well as assumptions concerning the scope of the subject matter and the classification rules. Subsequent parts focus on the debtor’s liability for non-performance or improper performance of an obligation with respect to both their types. The article also provides a general description of the obligations of best efforts.
EN
This paper examines the role of judicial jurisdiction in law-making process in statute countries. The analysis focused on the reformed Japanese Civil Code, which entered into force on 1 April 2020, and more specifically on the conflict between the reformed Civil Code and the precedents of previous legal status. The purpose of the paper was to emphasize that it is extremely important to consider the relationship between new rules and previous precedents. By using the reformed rules of “contract for work” in the Japanese Civil Code reform, this article analyzes and explains the meaning of precedent in law-making process.
PL
W niniejszym artykule zbadano rolę orzecznictwa sądowego w procesie powstawania prawa w systemie prawa ustawowego. W toku analizy skoncentrowano się na zreformowanym japońskim Kodeksie cywilnym, który wszedł w życie z dniem 1 kwietnia 2020 r., a konkretnie na konflikcie między zreformowanym Kodeksem cywilnym a precedensami z poprzedniego stanu prawnego. Celem artykułu było rozważenie związku między nowymi przepisami a poprzednim orzecznictwem. Korzystając ze zreformowanych zasad „umowy o dzieło” w kontekście japońskiej reformy Kodeksu cywilnego, w niniejszym artykule przeanalizowano i wyjaśniono znaczenie precedensu w procesie stanowienia prawa.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.