Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  crime of terrorism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Prawnokarne instrumenty zapobiegania i zwalczania terroryzmu w polskim prawodawstwie

100%
Śledź M.
Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem
|
2015
|
vol. 37
|
issue 4
51 - 60
EN
The article examines the instruments for preventing and combating terrorism in Polish criminal law. The Act of 16 April 2004 amending the Criminal Code and other acts of parliament introduced a definition of terrorist offence into the Polish Criminal Code. According to this definition, “A terrorist offence is a prohibited act punishable by a maximum custodial sentence of at least 5 years committed in order to: 1) seriously intimidate many persons, 2) compel a public authority of the Republic of Poland or of another state or an agency of an international organisation to perform or abstain from performing certain acts, 3) cause serious destabilisation in the political system or economy of the Republic of Poland, another state or international organisation. A threat to commit such an act should also be considered a terrorist offence.”
2
Content available remote

Terrorism as a crime under international customary law introduced by special tribunal for Lebanon

86%
Mareček L.
The Lawyer Quarterly
|
2017
|
vol. 7
|
issue 2
73-86
EN
The attitude of Special Tribunal for Lebanon to the issue of terrorism was introduced in its interlocutory decision on the applicable law. Author in this article is analysing its definition of distinct crime, its reasoning which was crucial to introduce such definition and its importance in relation to Lebanese law. The aim of this article is not only to identify the attitude of Special Tribunal for Lebanon but also to criticize distinct decision with intention to find, if STL argumentation is valid and sound, as this decision was highly criticised by a number of scholars. Last aim is to adopt an attitude toward to this decision in ways of its relation to international criminal law and international criminal judiciary on one hand and on the other hand its importance to proceedings at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.