Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  criminal case
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Właściwość sądów w sprawach karnych w Polsce w latach 1928–1939

100%
Koredczuk J.
Prawo
|
2013
|
issue 315/2
139 - 159
EN
The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1928 provided three types of jurisdiction: material, topical and functional. In general, legal solutions adopted in the Code including provisions on material jurisdiction should be viewed positively. The regulations covered all the cases the Polish courts could hypothetically come across in practice, procedurally solving many issues connected with it. The most important cases included: the invalidity of judgments issued by the improper court, the jurisdiction of the magistrates courts, the determination of the topical jurisdiction of the courts, the aggregate consideration of cases, and resolving conflicts of jurisdiction between common and military courts. Few of their infirmities were cured either by amending the Code, or through judicial decisions (especially the Supreme Court). The functioning of the rules on jurisdiction contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, was closely linked with the provisions of the Criminal Code of 1932 and the Law on Courts of 1928. In total, they were one of the best parts of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1928, contributing to quite efficient — in the years 1918–1939 — course of proceedings and functioning of justice in criminal cases.
2

Implementation of the Functions of Prosecution in a Criminal Case: Historical and Legal Analysis

100%
Yuldoshev R.
Internal Security
|
2012
|
vol. 4(1)
41-54
EN
In this article the author considers problems of the relations, interaction and mutual transitions of the function of prosecution under criminal investigation. Criminal prosecution was not procedurally established previously in the implementation of UPK RТ (1961). Instead, the procedure for the initiation of a criminal case was fixed. From the fact that this is new, it is possible to assume that, since April 1st 2010, its application will cause problems. Firstly, it is caused by an outdated legal base in this area, and secondly, a deficiency in the methodical maintenance by law enforcement bodies to investigate criminal cases of the private, private-public and public prosecution. The urgency of the chosen topic is not in question, as it is, in turn starting with UUS 1864г, and currently doesn't cease to be controversial, both in theory and practice of the application of legislation of the legal institutes. Thus, various opinions, statements of outstanding eminent scientists on the above issues, their analysis, processing and corresponding conclusions are considered. In passing, also considered is the question on a parity of criminal prosecution, implementation of the criminal case and implementation of the criminal prosecution, and debate about the conclusions, the analysis of the insights of practitioners, statistics and a number of other questions connected with this topic, and also extensive analysis and consideration of the legal literature taking into account the historical and legal analysis.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Subject Matter of Criminal Evidence Relating to the Disclosure of Information on Security Measures Applicable to Law Enforcement or Control Officials

88%
Zajcew O., Yepikhin A.
Internal Security
|
2018
|
vol. 10(1)
261-270
EN
The article analyses the characteristics of the subject of evidence (Article 73 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation) of objective and subjective characteristics of crime, which are listed in Article 320 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. Considerable attention has been given to the establishment of criminal sanctions for the disclosure of information on security measures towards law enforcement or control officials as an important guarantee of the stability of the Russian management system and legal protection activities. The characteristics of the subject-matter of the evidence in criminal matters under investigation are expressed in the need to establish objective and subjective grounds for disclosing information on security measures in the course of criminal proceedings against law enforcement or control officials. The state protection measures themselves are defined by separate regulations and are applied in the process of criminal proceedings and in the presence of evidence. However, this complex and multifaceted security process could be seriously undermined by the‘leak’ of classified security information. In case of such illegal disclosure, the penalty is defined in Article 320 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. The authors draw attention to the existence of a direct or indirect relationship between the unauthorised activity and performing state service in legal protection bodies, as well as the need to prove the intention to commit this crime and the awareness of not disclosing secret information to unauthorized persons who do not have formal access to the above information. The authors conclude that the implementation of criminal evidence proceedings for the criminal case of the offence under Article 320 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation needs to be improved at this stage in order to increase the effectiveness and security of the protection of judges, law enforcement and control officials in Russia.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Granice mocy wiążącej wyroków karnych w postępowaniu cywilnym

76%
Koper R.
Studia Prawnicze
|
2016
|
issue 1 (205)
127-152
EN
The paper is a study of binding force of criminal court’s judgement in civil proceedings, related to issue of applying of the article 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The aim of the paper is an attempt to delineate model boundaries of binding of criminal court’s judgement in civil proceedings, in connection with applicaton of such relevant legal regulation. The author focuses on the presentation of the most important threads arising from need to take into account factual situation related to commission of a criminal offence contained in a conviction. The existing normative regulation has been examined and its defects identified. The analysis is connected with consideration of such complex problem from the point of view of recent changes in the amending concerning criminal proceedings and criminal law too. Gathering the tesis specified in article, the author notes that regulation mentioned above doesn’t create legal rule on the clear scope of application
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Sprawy karne SS-manów z załogi KL Auschwitz przed sądami powszechnymi w Polsce w latach 1946–1955. Artykuł koncepcyjny

63%
Kowalski G. M.
|
2021
|
vol. XXIV
|
issue 24
99-112
EN
The article aims to present the concept of research on the trials of the members of the SS garrison of the former German Nazi concentration and extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau before common courts in Poland in the years 1946–1955. It presents selected issues related to the analyzed subject, along with an exemplary literature, and shows incomplete statistical data. Information about 8502 SS men can be found in the database The SS KL Auschwitz Garrison available on the Internet. On the basis of the collected materials, it can be concluded that in the period, the number of people for whom any documents of the judiciary have survived is 722. On the other hand, the number of SS men from the KL Auschwitz garrison, against whom court proceedings ended with a verdict in Poland, is 695. The next step towards characterizing the trials of SS-men from the KL Auschwitz garrison pending before Polish courts should be a complete description of the state of research and literature on the subject.
PL
Artykuł ma na celu przedstawienie koncepcji badań nad procesami członków załogi SS byłego niemieckiego nazistowskiego obozu koncentracyjnego i zagłady Auschwitz-Birkenau przed sądami powszechnymi w Polsce w latach 1946‒1955. Przedstawiono w nim wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące analizowanej tematyki wraz z przykładową literaturą oraz niepełne dane statystyczne. W dostępnej w internecie bazie Załoga SS KL Auschwitz znajdują się informacje o 8502 SS-manach. Na podstawie zgromadzonych materiałów można stwierdzić, że w omawianym okresie liczba osób, co do których zachowały się jakiekolwiek dokumenty wymiaru sprawiedliwości, wynosi 722. Natomiast liczba SS-manów z załogi KL Auschwitz, co do których przeprowadzono postępowanie sądowe zakończone wyrokiem w Polsce, wynosi 695. Kolejnym krokiem w kierunku przeprowadzenia charakterystyki procesów SS-manów z załogi KL Auschwitz toczących się przed polskimi sądami winno być pełne opisanie stanu badań i literatury przedmiotu.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.