Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  criticism of metaphysics
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Problem konceptualizacji doświadczenia metafizycznego

100%
EN
The critical approach to metaphysics has usually two dimensions: methodological dimension on the one hand, and semantic one on the other. From the methodological point of view a main problem of metaphysics can be defined in terms of lack of proper procedures that may lead to the verification of metaphysical theses. The semantic criticism is based on the assumption that all conceptual schemata of a scientific domain should be characterized as having two semantic properties: meaning and reference. Critics argue that metaphysical concepts have the real problem both with reference and meaning. In this paper I argue for a different approach to the aforementioned problems. My claim is that metaphysics is in trouble because a metaphysical experience essentially goes beyond the descriptive power of conceptual schemata. I analyze that thesis in two perspectives: nature and function of experience in general as well as limits of conceptualization as a main cognitive activity. In the third part of the paper the idea of fundamental concepts of metaphysics will be introduced as an illustration of the main thesis of my paper.
EN
The critical approach to metaphysics has usually two dimensions: methodological dimension on the one hand, and semantic one on the other. From the methodological point of view a main problem of metaphysics can be defined in terms of lack of proper procedures that may lead to the verification of metaphysical theses. The semantic criticism is based on the assumption that all conceptual schemata of a scientific domain should be characterized as having two semantic properties: meaning and reference. Critics argue that metaphysical concepts have the real problem both with reference and meaning. In this paper I argue for a different approach to the aforementioned problems. My claim is that metaphysics is in trouble because a metaphysical experience essentially goes beyond the descriptive power of conceptual schemata. I analyze that thesis in two perspectives: nature and function of experience in general as well as limits of conceptualization as a main cognitive activity. In the third part of the paper the idea of fundamental concepts of metaphysics will be introduced as an illustration of the main thesis of my paper.
EN
The article is an attempt to examine the semantic potential of the concept of the invisible environment used by Helena Radlińska. Using various concepts and tropes present in the pedagogical tradition and in contemporary humanities, the author tries to answer the question: What dimensions of experience does pedagogical thinking open to when we use the category of an invisible environment? This study was performed in the following few steps. First, the author recalls the original context of the concept located in American social work. Then he traces the semantic shifts in the use of the term invisible environment in Radlińska’s work. At the same time, he reconstructs and argumentatively strengthens the cultural and metaphysical context of this category. In the next step, he recalls the categories functioning in pedagogical literature, among others: invisibility, hiding, noiselessness. An important part of the text is the search for the concept of invisibility (and its synonyms) in contemporary humanities. It turns out that pedagogy can benefit from the clues contained in the works of Charles Taylor, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Mikhail Bakhtin, Michael Oakeshott, Jacques Rancière, Michael Polanyi, Hans-Georg Gadamer and others. In the end, the author refers to the typology of aspects of the invisible environment by Lech Witkowski and tries to enrich it with new elements.
PL
Artykuł stanowi próbę zbadania potencjału semantycznego stosowanego przez Helenę Radlińską pojęcia niewidzialnego środowiska. Korzystając z rozmaitych koncepcji i tropów obecnych w tradycji pedagogicznej i we współczesnej humanistyce, autor stara się odpowiedzieć na pytanie: Na jakie wymiary doświadczenia otwiera się pedagogiczne myślenie, gdy stosujemy kategorię niewidzialnego środowiska? Badanie to zostało przeprowadzone w kilku następujących krokach. Najpierw autor przywołuje pierwotny kontekst pojęcia umiejscowiony w amerykańskiej pracy socjalnej. Następnie śledzi przesunięcia semantyczne w użyciu terminu niewidzialne środowisko w twórczości Radlińskiej. Rekonstruuje przy tym i wzmacnia argumentacyjnie kulturowy i metafizyczny kontekst tej kategorii. W następnym kroku przywołuje kategorie m.in. niewidzialności, ukrycia, bezszelestności funkcjonujące w literaturze pedagogicznej. Ważną częścią tekstu jest poszukiwanie pojęcia niewidzialności (i jej synonimów) we współczesnej humanistyce. Okazuje się, że pedagogika może skorzystać na tropach zawartych w twórczości Charlesa Taylora, Maurice’a Merleau-Ponty’ego, Michaiła Bachtina, Michaela Oakeshotta, Jacquesa Rancière’a, Michaela Polanyi’ego, Hansa-Georga Gadamera i innych. W zakończeniu autor nawiązuje do typologii aspektów środowiska niewidzialnego Lecha Witkowskiego i próbuje ją wzbogacić o nowe elementy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.