Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  damages directive
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dyrektywa 2014/104/UE a kształtowanie prywatnoprawnego modelu dochodzenia roszczeń odszkodowawczych z tytułu naruszenia prawa konkurencji w państwach członkowskich i w Unii Europejskiej

100%
Pachuca-Smulska B.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2016
|
vol. C
135-149
PL
Artykuł prezentuje regulacje prawne oraz orzecznictwo, które ukształtowały prywatnoprawny model dochodzenia roszczeń odszkodowawczych z tytułu naruszenia prawa konkurencji w państwach członkowskich i w Unii Europejskiej. Autorka podejmuje próbę opisu i oceny rozwiązań prawnych przyjętych przez Dyrektywę Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2014/104/UE z 26 listopada 2014 r. w sprawie niektórych przepisów regulujących dochodzenie roszczeń odszkodowawczych z tytułu naruszenia prawa konkurencji państw członkowskich i Unii Europejskiej, na tle problemów, które przyjęta dyrektywa powinna rozwiązać. Równocześnie wskazuje na pewne wady przyjętych rozwiązań.
EN
The article examines legal regulations and court verdicts which have formed the private law model for making damage claims for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union. The author discusses and evaluates legal instruments of Directive 2014/104/EU on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union in the context of problems this Directive strives to resolve with regard to shortcomings of those instruments.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Effect of National Decisions on Actions for Competition Damages in the CEE Countries

100%
Pärn-Lee E.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2017
|
vol. 10(15)
177-198
EN
One of the main objectives of the so-called Damages Directive (2014/104/EU) was to make antitrust enforcement more effective. Although in most EU countries private antitrust enforcement has been possible subject to general rules of civil law; the number of private antitrust litigations has remained relatively low. It is presumed that the complementary roles of public and private enforcement, as well as the synergy between them, will take effect if formal decisions taken during public enforcement will have binding effect with regard to follow-on private litigations. According to the Damages Directive, final national decisions on competition infringements shall have binding effect in follow-on litigations. What is to be understood under ‘binding effect’, and the potential effects thereof, has been subject to a lively debate among academics and practitioners. It has been questioned if decisions of an executive body can bind the judiciary, and if so, to what extent. What is the evidentiary value of a formal decision of a NCA regarding national courts, but also on the court of another Member State. The article deals with the main issues and arguments presented in the general debate on the binding effect of national competition law decisions, and provides a closer look on this topic with regard to specific CEE countries.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.