Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  debt restructuring
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Numerous research papers substantiate the idea that GDP-linked bonds could provide a potential means for indebted countries to avoid default (the cost of which to be measured by an endowment loss and temporary exclusion from capital markets) by linking current reduction of the total outstanding debt with liabilities to share future gains of growth of national economy. Actualization of this idea has already taken place in a dozen of countries. This article presents comparative analysis of background, terms and condition of the last three cases of GDP-indexed bonds emission – by Argentina, Greece and Ukraine. Commensuration of the share of haircut, threshold for payments and availability of the cap provides for detection of trends in the design of these debt instruments.
EN
The article is devoted to the review of bankruptcy procedures of an individual in Ukraine. In particular, attention is focused on guaranteeing the right to peaceful enjoyment of the individual’s possessions
PL
W ostatnich latach w porządku prawnym Unii Europejskiej pojawiło się wiele rozwiązań, które mają przyczynić się do rozwiązywania potencjalnych kryzysów zadłużeniowych w strefie euro. Jednym z kluczowych elementów nowo tworzonego systemu przywracania stabilności fiskalnej państw członkowskich jest proces restrukturyzacji zadłużenia oparty na wykorzystaniu klauzul wspólnego działania. Zagrożeniem dla skuteczności tego procesu jest działalność sępich funduszy, która uzasadnia interwencję unijnego prawodawcy. Artykuł ma dwa równorzędne cele. Pierwszym z nich jest wskazanie przesłanek wprowadzenia do porządku prawnego Unii Europejskiej rozwiązań, które ograniczałyby działalność sępich funduszy na rynku długu publicznego państw członkowskich strefy euro. Drugim celem jest natomiast określenie założeń leżących u podstaw tego typu regulacji. W trakcie pracy nad artykułem posłużono się analizą dogmatyczną oraz prawnoporównawczą.
EN
In recent years, many solutions have emerged in the legal order of the European Union that are to contribute to solving potential debt crises in the Euro area. One of the key elements of the newly created system intended for restoring fiscal stability of Member States is the process of debt restructuring based on the use of joint action clauses. The threat to the effectiveness of this process is the activity of the vulture funds which justifies the intervention of the EU legislator. The article has two equal goals. The first one is the indication of the reasons for introducing into the legal order of the European Union solutions that would limit the activities of vulture funds on the public debt market of Member States included in the Eurozone. The second aim is to define the assumptions underlying this type of regulation. While working on the article, a dogmatic and legal-comparative analysis was used.
EN
Even after one of the most severe multi-year crises on record in the advanced economies, the received wisdom in policy circles clings to the notion that high-income countries are completely different from their emerging market counterparts. The current phase of the official policy approach is predicated on the assumption that debt sustainability can be achieved through a mix of austerity, forbearance and growth. The claim is that advanced countries do not need to resort to the standard toolkit of emerging markets, including debt restructurings and conversions, higher inflation, capital controls and other forms of financial repression. As we document, this claim is at odds with the historical track record of most advanced economies, where debt restructuring or conversions, financial repression, and a tolerance for higher inflation, or a combination of these were an integral part of the resolution of significant past debt overhangs.
5
84%
RU
Концепция банкротства суверенных государств берет начало в работах А. Смита, Б. Миллера, которые, так или иначе, указывали и обосновывали необходимость формирования механизма банкротства публично-правовых образований с целью оптимизации экономического климата внутри страны в период кризиса, сохранения государственной конкурентоспособности на мировой арене и устойчивости управления экономическими процессами как на национальном, так и на международном уровнях. Особенно актуальной рассматриваемая проблематика представляется в свете последних событий, имеющих как экономический, так и политико-правовой аспекты: эскалация военных конфликтов, геополитическая напряженность в мировом сообществе, гиперинфляция, рост государственного долга США и пр. Фактическая финансовая неплатежеспособность ряда государств становится важнейшей проблемой, разрешение которой требует не только формирования института государственного банкротства на теоретическом уровне, процедуры которого будут способны эффективно справляться с долговыми кризисами публично-правовых образований, но и реально применимого механизма реструктуризации суверенных долгов на практике.
EN
The concept of sovereign bankruptcy originated in the works of A. Smith, B. Miller, in which the need for the formation of the mechanism of bankruptcy of public law entities was anyhow pointed and justified in order to optimize the economic climates in the countries during the crisis, to keep the state competitiveness in the global stage and the overstability of economic processes at both the national and international levels. The concerned problematics is anxiously actual in light of the recent events: the escalation of military conflicts, geopolitical tensions in the international community, hyperinflation, raising US government debt, etc. The factual financial insolvency of a number of states becomes a major problem. The resolution of this issue requires not only formation of the institution of the state bankruptcy at a theoretical level, but also effective procedures which will be able to cope with a debt crisis of public legal entities in practice. An attempt to present the history of the idea of sovereign bankruptcy, to systematize the most appropriate mechanisms and suggested ways of overcoming the debt crisis in the area of sovereign insolvency was made by the author. The problem of bankruptcy of administrative-territorial units was indicated separately.
EN
Economic relations between Comecon countries led by the Soviet Union (communist bloc) and OECD countries (Western Europe, the USA, Canada and Japan) in the 1980s were characterized by deep stagnation in all areas of mutual cooperation. This was due to many negative factors interconnected in a short time. They were very diverse in terms of nature, range and durability of impact. The article contains an analysis of the development of the financial and credit relations of the Soviet bloc countries with the West in the 1980s in the existing political and economic conditions of East-West relations. The financial and credit dependence of the socialist countries was very clear and intense at that time. Its elimination or reduction as a result of the development of connections in other directions was only partially possible. Its negative impact also covered areas vital for individual economies. In addition, it was of a long-term nature, which made this type of dependence useful as an economic instrument for political purposes, both in the aspect of short-term and long-term pressure on the implementation of political intentions. When analyzing the entirety of East-West economic contacts, one cannot omit the problem of the debt of the Comecon countries, which largely determines the development of all areas of cooperation. In the 1980s, in Comecon-OECD credit relations, two trends clearly intersected: negative and positive. A negative trend was manifested in the increase in debt burdening the economies of many Central and Eastern European countries. This was caused by an increase in payment liabilities for servicing debts resulting from the postponement of loan repayment dates.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.