Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  decrees
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Organizacja i przebieg I i II synodu na ziemi sandomierskiej

100%
Lipiński G.
Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej
|
2019
|
issue 26
225-240
EN
When Pope Pius VII erected the diocese, Poland was partitioned, and the partitioners did not accepted conducting the diocesan Synod. The first synod of the diocese took place in 1923, when the situation in the country allowed it. The purpose of this synod was to specify particular Church Law. The post-war period was characterized by numerous problems, among which the issue of relations with the communist authorities was at the forefront. They tried to influence the Church and claimed the right to approve priests for pastoral posts. They also removed religion from schools, and took part in church buildings. The activities of religious associations were forbidden. Religious life has centred around churches in such a difficult situation. Sacraments were performed here and the ministry of teaching was carried out. The catechization of children and youth took place in parish rooms (rented garages, barracks or rooms). The pre-marital catechesis was gradually spread. On 21st November 1996, Bishop Wacław Świerzawski convened the Second Synod of the Diocese of Sandomierz. In December of the same year, individual synod commissions began to work. Most of them were divided into subcommittees, which the Commission for Church Structures divided into sections. Issues were assigned to be elaborated by individual sub-commissions and sections. They started with studying the relevant Council documents, papal documents, norms of common and particular law of the Diocese of Sandomierz, Przemyśl, Lublin and Tarnów. The work on Synodal legislation lasted until 16th April 1999, when they gathered for the last, fifth plenary session of the Synod.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola środków zapobiegawczych w kanonicznym prawie karnym. Czy możliwy jest od nich rekurs?

80%
Kiełpiński K.
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
|
2022
|
vol. 74
|
issue 2
267-291
EN
The purpose of the canonical administrative and criminal procedure is to ensure a fair trial (suspect - accused) of cases concerning delicta contra mores offenses. Therefore, in the course of the preliminary investigation, an ordinary imposes preventive measures, which are supposed to achieve a specific purpose. They are not punishments, but administrative acts which serve many entities. The doctrine in this matter has undergone a specific evolution. The regulations contained in the Code of 1917 forbade appealing against a decree which contained such measures. The current legal regulations allow the submission of a recourse in this area. It should be based on the rules concerning hierarchical recourses. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is the competent superior in this area, because it makes final decisions in relation to all the issues connected with delicta graviora offenses. Unfortunately, they are very rare, because lawyers or solicitors are not allowed to suggest this type of solution to suspects at the preliminary investigation level.
PL
Kanoniczna procedura administracyjno-karna ma zapewnić sprawiedliwy proces (podejrzany – oskarżony) o przestępstwa delicta contra mores. Dlatego w postępowaniu przygotowawczym ordynariusz nakłada środki zapobiegawcze, które mają służyć osiągnięciu określonego celu. Nie są one karami, lecz aktami administracyjnymi, które służą wielu podmiotom. Doktryna w tej materii dokonała swoistej ewolucji. Regulacje zawarte w kodeksie z 1917 r. zabraniały odwoływania się do dekretu, który zawierał takie środki. Obecne regulacje prawne pozwalają na złożenie regresu w tym zakresie. Powinien on być oparty na przepisach dotyczących rekursów hierarchicznych. Kompetentnym przełożonym w tej dziedzinie jest Kongregacja Nauki Wiary, gdyż to ona definitywnie rozstrzyga wszystkie kwestie związane z wykroczeniami delicta graviora. Niestety, są one podejmowane bardzo rzadko, ponieważ często na poziomie postępowania przygotowawczego adwokat lub radca prawny nie ma prawa sugerować podejrzanemu tego typu rozwiązań.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.