Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  demographic structures
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Germany - Two Demographically Different States?

100%
Szymańska D., Środa-Murawska S., Biegańska J.
Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
|
2008
|
vol. 10
|
issue 10
85-92
EN
The paper is an attempt of an answer how belonging to different political, economical and cultural structures has influenced diverse population processes and structures and their spatial diversity. As an example to the research of these phenomena there was chosen Germany that until 1990 were two separated socio-political and economical formations (the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the Federal Republic of Germany FRG). This state, with a population number about 82 millions presently, as it turns out - besides passage of time - is characterized all the time by some diversity of procreation behaviors, population processes and structures in the Eastern (Ost) and the Western part (West) of Germany. It is claimed, the structures are going to some similarities, but the 15 years period (1990-2005) was too short to level all stated demographical differences and trends (1).
2
Content available remote

The Geo-Demographic Dimension of Romanian Rural Space

88%
Staşac M., Albu I., Stupariu M.
Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
|
2010
|
vol. 13
|
issue 13
19-30
EN
Knowing, researching into and developing the rural space are activities of utmost importance for a country, both by the dimension of the rural space, expressed by the surface as such, and by the dimension of the demographic component (of the rural population). Referring to Romanian rural space, this is dominant, representing almost 94% of Romania's total surface (93.7%). In what concerns the demographic component (population), as it is known, this confers a particular dynamics to the rural space, generating a series of quantitative and qualitative aspects. At present the share of the rural population reaches 47% out of the total of Romania's population. Generally speaking, we can assert that the village and generally the Romanian village remains further on the main propeller of life. Thus the share of the rural population, besides the whole range of socio-demographic indicators, which can outline the degree of stability or instability of the rural space, as well as other basic indicators, such as the share of the rural population occupied in productive activities, socio-cultural services, tourism activities, etc., enhance the importance of the rural life from one country or another, reason for which the development of the rural space remains a problem of a national and international level. Consequently, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has raised the issue of the rural space at the level of European and Community policy.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Population of Wieliczka in 1788 – Household Size and Structure*

63%
Pieczara J.
Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski
|
2019
|
vol. 41
81-122
PL
Artykuł ma na celu określenie głównych parametrów demograficznych dla mieszkańców Wieliczki w XVIII wieku oraz zestawienie otrzymanych wyników z rezultatami badań europejskich naukowców. Analiza została przeprowadzona na podstawie bazy danych utworzonej w na podstawie spisu ludności parafii św. Klemensa oraz wielickich ksiąg metrykalnych. Główne metody zastosowane w badaniu to typologia rodzinnych gospodarstw domowych Petera Lasletta i analiza średniego wieku w momencie rozpoczęcia pierwszego małżeństwa dla mężczyzn i kobiet, którzy wchodzili w sakramentalny związek do 50 roku życia (SMAM). Ludność mieszkająca w Wieliczce w 1788 roku była społeczeństwem młodym, rozwijającym się, reprezentującym typ progresywny zgodnie z klasyfikacją Gustava Sundbärga. Średnia liczba mieszkańców gospodarstwa domowego wynosiła 4,7 osób. W mieście górniczym dominowały rodziny nuklearne, na czele których stał mężczyzna. Interesująca pozostaje kwestia niewielkiej liczby jednoosobowych gospodarstw domowych. Porównując Wieliczkę z dużymi miastami, takimi jak Kraków i Warszawa, zauważono, że górnicze miasto zamieszkiwał większy odsetek dzieci i młodzieży. Przedstawiono także różnice wiekowe między grupami kawalerów i panien, wynikające z analizy wskaźników i zastosowania analizy SMAM. Ostatecznie, otrzymane rezultaty dla górniczego miasta zostały porównane z wynikami dla innych regionów i krajów europejskich, co pozwoliło postawić tezę, że Wieliczka reprezentuje przejściowy europejski model małżeństwa.
EN
The article aimed to determine the main demographic parameters for the inhabitants of Wieliczka, a mining town, in the 18th century, and to compare the results obtained with the results of studies by European researchers. The analysis was carried out via a database created on the basis of a census in the parish of St. Clemens, and Wieliczka birth, marriage and death certificates. The main methods used in the study were Peter Laslett’s typology of family households and Cezary Kuklo’s modification of it, and the Singulate Mean Age At Marriage (SMAM). The population living in Wieliczka in 1788 was a young, growing society of the progressive type according to Gustav Sundbärg’s classification. The average number of people living in a household was 4.7. Nuclear families run by a male head dominated in Wieliczka. The issue of a small number of single-person households is interesting. In comparison with other cities, it was noticed that a larger percentage of children and young people lived in Wieliczka than in large national cities, i.e., Krakow and Warsaw. Also given are the age differences between bachelors and spinsters resulting from an analysis of metrics and the SMAM study. Finally, the results for Wieliczka were compared with the results from European countries, which led to the conclusions that the European marriage model is too radical to capture specific local demographics in Europe.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.