Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: descendant

Sort By:

Limit search:

Abraham – a Canaanite? Tracing the Beginnings of the Literary Tradition of Abraham

100%

Lemański J. A.

The Biblical Annals

2021

vol. 11

issue 2

185-230

The objective of the article is to present the current state of discussion on the first literary version of the series about Abraham and its sources or roots. The current state of research suggests that the starting point of the literary version of the narrative about this patriarch may have been a kind of tradition associated with the local shrine in Mamre, near Hebron. The other theory describes the idea of the promise of a descendant in return for the extraordinary and extended hospitality towards God. More importantly, this tradition may have been connected with Abraham from the very beginning, but it does not necessarily have to have been. The first version of a longer narrative about Abraham was the cycle of Abraham – Lot – Sodom (Gen 18*–19*). An introduction to the cycle (Gen 13:5-13) was written, already including the content of the two chapters mentioned above. According to the original version of the cycle, Abraham is not yet closely related to Lot, but he is an autochthonous character. Obviously, the goal of the series remains the ethnogenesis of the inhabitants of Judah in relation to the neighbouring peoples (the Moabites and Ammonites). Moreover, the latter clearly form a negative contrast here – both ethnically and civilisationally. This version of the narrative can be dated back to the end of the 7th century before Christ. The subsequent extensions or enlargements were initially associated with the combining of the characters of Abraham and Jacob. Such a combination could have been achieved, amongst others, by identifying the descendant promised to Abraham with Isaac. The priestly tradition internationalised Abraham even more and thus made him a pilgrim who had come from Ur of the Chaldeans.

Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 23 października 2019 r., III CZP 23/19

71%

Wolak G.

Studia Prawnicze KUL

2021

issue 2

297-312

It may raise some doubts whether a person entitled to a legitimate portion within the meaning of art.991 § 1 Civil Code, is the bequeather’s grandchild as a further descendant, when confirmation of inheritance acquisition was based on the last will and testament and the bequeather’s child as a statutory heir rejected the inheritance under the Act and had not been appointed to inherit under that last will and testament. In the gloss to the resolution of the Supreme Court of 23rd October 2019, III CZP 23/19, the author accepted the view that a remote descendant of bequeather whose ascendant (bequeather’s child), not appointed to inherit under the bequeather’s last will and testament regarding the entire inheritance, rejected the inheritance, has no right to legitimate portion.

Pewne wątpliwości może budzić to, czy osobą uprawnioną do zachowku w rozumieniu art. 991 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego jest wnuk spadkodawcy jako dalszy zstępny, gdy stwierdzenie nabycia spadku nastąpiło na podstawie testamentu, a dziecko spadkodawcy jako spadkobierca ustawowy odrzuciło spadek z ustawy i nie zostało powołane do dziedziczenia na podstawie tego testamentu. W glosie do uchwały z dnia 23 października 2019 r., III CZP 24/19, glosator zaaprobował stanowisko Sądu Najwyższego, zgodnie z którym dalszy zstępny spadkodawcy nie jest uprawniony do zachowku po nim, jeśli – w razie dziedziczenia testamentowego – zstępny spadkodawcy złożył oświadczenie o odrzuceniu spadku z ustawy.

Refine search results

1 Studia Prawnicze KUL

1 The Biblical Annals

1 Lemański J. A.

1 Wolak G.

2 2021

Search results

Abraham – a Canaanite? Tracing the Beginnings of the Literary Tradition of Abraham

Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 23 października 2019 r., III CZP 23/19