Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  dezinformace
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The text is focused primarily on the concept of informed consumers in the Czech law. We do not aim to cover exhaustively the whole field. The main target of the article is to introduce specific questions which are connected to such a topic. In the beginning we primarily introduce general characteristics of the informed consumer, then we analyse pre-contractual information obligation and the demands focused on the transparency. As the position of the consumer is weaker than the position of the entrepreneur, misleading commercial practices and unfair contract terms are examined as well. The text is then focused on sector specific rules, such as in the area of financial services and on the aspects of the digital consumer. Throughout the text, some problematic aspects of Czech regulation or inappropriate implementation of European legislation are mentioned as well. The aim of the article is to introduce national specifics within abovementioned areas and to analyse relevant questions of consumer protection connected with information duty of the entrepreneurs.
EN
The fundamental impact of radio, so characteristic of the first half of the 20th century, or television, which dominated the second half of the 20th century, is a thing of the past. Instead, the 21st century is characterised by the rise of digital technologies that confront the “traditional” media environment with numerous challenges. One important phenomenon is disinformation and disinformation media. Although they have been studied and observed for decades they have come to the attention of both the professional and lay public in the context of two significant recent societal challenges: the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. While the impact of disinformation has been debated in the context of the former, there has been no blocking of it. In the latter case, however, the action was taken to suppress the availability of disinformation content. The ultimate aim of this article is to assess the constitutionality of blocking disinformation content in general terms, using the experience of the disinformation campaigns around Covid-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war as a case in point.
CS
Zcela zásadní dopad rozhlasu, tak typický pro první polovinu 20. století, nebo televize, která dominovala druhé polovině 20. století, se zdá být do značné míry minulostí. Pro 21. století je příznačný vzestup digitálních technologií, která konfrontují „tradiční“ mediální prostředí s četnými výzvami. Jedním z důležitých jevů jsou dezinformace a dezinformační média. Jakkoli je možné je studovat a pozorovat desítky let a věnovala se jim řada výzkumníků, pro odbornou i laickou veřejnost se dostaly do popředí v souvislosti se dvěma výraznými společenskými výzvami nedávné doby: pandemií covid-19 a rusko-ukrajinskou válkou. Zatímco v souvislosti s první jmenovanou událostí byl dopad dezinformací předmětem diskuzí, k jejich blokování nedošlo. V případě druhé jmenované události pak bylo k potlačení dostupnosti dezinformačního obsahu přikročeno. Konečným cílem tohoto článku je v obecných rysech zhodnotit ústavnost blokování dezinformačního obsahu a využít k tomu právě zkušenosti s dezinformačními kampaněmi kolem covidu-19 a rusko-ukrajinské války.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.