Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  dislocation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

А Вісла дале плыне Петра Мурянкы – автобіоґрафія як реінвенцийний міф

100%
Дуць-Файфер О.
Rocznik Ruskiej Bursy
|
2017
|
vol. 13: Akcja
149-167
EN
The article attempts to symptomatically read one of the most important texts in Lemko literature of the last decades – the literary autobiography of Petr Murianka entitled And the Vistula Flows On. A large textual machine working for a reinvented myth has been presented, which after the resettlement is to create a new narrative of the community. The Lemko myth works in defiance of the flowing Vistula River, that is, symbolically saving the order of the world with the homeland still remaining in the mountains and foreign lands where Lemkos were resettled. The autobiography was created 60 years after the destructive dislocation of Lemko population and is a testimony of persistent opposition to Polonisation highly determined by displacement. Dedicated to Polish neighbours and written in Lemko Polish, it contains a number of strategic elements acting in a myth-making way and at the same time performatively. What is characteristic for the autobiography - when establishing a pact with the reader it refers to his own people (the myth making pact) and to the neighbours (the pact of understanding). What was published with the aim of ‘describing life’ as an autobiography of a sixty-year-old is, first and foremost, an (auto)biography of a community which for sixty years has been drowning in the dominant trend of disenchanted history.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dislokace, extrapozice a nominativus pendens — srovnávací studie syntaktických struktur ve francouzštině a češtině

84%
Pešek O.
Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology)
|
2021
|
vol. 103
|
issue 2
183-209
EN
The study defines the categorial framework for the analysis of so-called dislocated structures in contrastive perspective. First, it describes the systemic possibilities of the French and Czech syntaxes in relation to the phenomena studied. The syntactical potential is assessed from a functional point of view, making it possible to explain differences in the use of systemically possible structures in the two languages. The evaluation of systemic possibilities is complemented by a parallel corpus analysis performed in the InterCorp corpus. The study does not include all cases classified as dislocation (extraposition) in the specialized literature, as it focuses primarily on the left-hand extraposition of selected valency verb complements.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Relationship of Turkey with Armenia

67%
Aslan D. H., Celiktas O. K.
Kwartalnik Naukowy Uczelni Vistula
|
2015
|
issue 2(44)
90-101
EN
Historical resources records the initial contacts between Turks and Armenians at 10th century as Turkic tribes commenced to immigrate to the lands today called as Anatolia. In the course of the Battle of Manzikert(1071), which is appreciated to be the milestone for Turks entrance to Anatolia, Armenians supported Turks against Byzantium imperia. Aftermaths, Turks and Armenians coexisted in this geography peacefully where Armenians were called by Ottomans as loyal nation to refer their loyalty towards the Ottoman authority. Till the period when the Ottoman Empire entered to its dissolution period, Christian Armenians and Muslim Turks lived together where Armenians along with other non-Muslim minorities of the Ottoman Empire enjoyed a religious and cultural freedom. Nevertheless toward the collapse of long standing the Ottoman Empire, Armenians who were looking for their dependency with the interference of imperial powers like Russian Empire, Great Britain and France, the Armenian problem gradually became an international question. Consequently, a conflict between the loyal nations of the Empire ended with a dislocation process the end of which caused heavy casualties that emerged a debate profoundly influencing foreign policy of modern Turkey in all directions.
PL
Źródła historyczne odnotowują pierwsze kontakty między Turkami i Ormianami w wieku X, kiedy to plemiona tureckie zaczęły napływać na tereny zwane dziś Anatolią. W trakcie Bitwy pod Manzikertem (1071 r.), która jest oceniana jako kamień milowy wejścia Turków do Anatolii, Ormianie wspierali Turków przeciwko imperiom Bizancjum. W następstwie tego Turcy i Ormianie współistnieli na tych terenach w sposób pokojowy – Ormianie byli traktowani przez Turków osmańskich jako naród lojalny, okazujący swą lojalność wobec władz państwa osmańskiego. Aż do czasu, kiedy to Imperium Osmańskie wkroczyło w okres swego rozpadu, chrześcijańscy Ormianie i muzułmańscy Turcy mieszkali razem, gdy Ormianie i inne niemuzułmańskie mniejszości Imperium Osmańskiego cieszyli się wolnością religijną i kulturową. Tym niemniej w miarę jak wielowiekowe Imperium Osmańskie chyliło się ku upadkowi, problem ormiański stawał się stopniowo zagadnieniem międzynarodowym, jako że Ormianie rozwiązanie kwestii swej podległości wiązali z interwencją potęg imperialnych, takich jak Imperium Rosyjskie, Wielka Brytania i Francja. W konsekwencji konflikt między tym lojalnym narodem Imperium skończył się procesem wypędzeń, które spowodowały dużą liczbę ofiar, co z kolei dało impuls debacie w dużej mierze wpływającej na politykę zagraniczną współczesnej Turcji we wszystkich jej kierunkach.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.