Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  dramatic discourse
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The application of linguistic theories and concepts as tools for analysis of literary works provides one of the most fascinating and illuminating insights into how they may be read, interpreted, and understood. This assumption underlies the objective of this paper in which I attempt to explicate an interpretation of Soyinka’s "The Trials of Brother Jero" through an application of the pragmatics tool of presupposition. Thus an attempt is made in this paper to present a linguistic analysis of the play by an examination of its meaning potentials in terms of presuppositions. In this regard, utterances of two major characters, Jero and Chume, his Assistant, are selected and analysed. It may be interesting to note that fictional characters express presuppositions as much as people in real life. Thus this study is a presentation of an interface between linguistics and literary works. In this linguistic study, literary discourse is exploited using the pragmatic concept of presupposition which underlines and underpins the explanatory adequacy of its explication. Stimulating insights are presented in the interpretation and understanding of Wole Soyinka’s "Trials of Brother Jero" as apiece of dramatic discourse which constitute and promote the interface of linguistic science and literary science.
EN
Literary works are a constant topic of commentary. Literary texts carry specific metalinguistic and metapragmatic elements and require metalinguistic and metapragmatic codes and competences in order to prevent misunderstanding. Our paper aims to highlight the reasons for attaching the metatextual label to Eugène Ionesco’s dramatic work. Ionesco’s plays can be viewed as some sort of comment on previous dramatic texts defying the traditional theatrical conventions. Remarks on literature and art appear all through his life: in critical texts, as well as in his characters’ statements. Metatextual comment is deeply embedded in the production of dramatic text itself and is placed at the natural confluence of the playwright and the reader, that is, of the one who writes the plays and the one who watches his writing.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.