Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  driving ban
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
The Lawyer Quarterly
|
2022
|
vol. 12
|
issue 2
128-140
EN
The article presents, in a comprehensive manner, the current model of the disqualification from driving vehicles (driving ban) in the petty offences law. Using historical references, the author discusses regulations adopted in this regard, taking account of the doubts arising as to the interpretation of certain aspects of the functioning of the ban. Indicating areas which in the author’s opinion prove that the driving ban’s current formulation is flawed, she signals the need for further amendments, which would lead to the establishment of more rational normative solutions.
EN
The author, comparing driving licence confiscation carried out on the basis of Articles 137 § 1 point 1 of The Road Traffic Act with the preventive measure under Articles 276 of the Code of Penal Procedure, consisting in an order to desist from driving a defined type of cars, indicates the existence of a legal gap in the Polish Penal Code, clearly consisting in a lack of regulations concerning counting the actual period of confiscation of a driving licence towards the period of an imposed driving ban. It can be complied at present with analogy of Articles 63 § 2 of the Penal Code. The ruling in this matter should be contained in the sentence (Art. 413 § 1 point 2 of the Code of Penal Procedure), and if the sentence does not contain this ruling, then the court takes it up with a resolution at a hearing (Art. 420 § 1 of the Code of Penal Procedure).
3
88%
EN
This article presents a driving ban in the context of the amendments of the Criminal Code from 1997. The changes concerning the penal measure have tightened criminal responsibility by introducing, among other a driving ban imposed on forever (art. 42 § 3 and 4 k.k.) and which led to increase of the number of legal grounds for adjudication under a mandatory ban. Obligatory character of the penal measure adversily affects the freedom of decision of the court leading to automatic and schematic delivering judgement. Regulations of de facto lifelong driving ban is inconsistent with other provisions of the Criminal Code, including possibility of seizure of conviction (art. 107 § 6 k.k.).
EN
Changes in penal measures resulting from the amendment to the Penal Code of 13 June 2019 constitute the subject matter of the article. The author analyses the consequences of those changes. The authors of the amendments to the act declared that the level would increase the protection of children through criminal law, which was their main motive. The article reveals various errors and disad­vantages of the legal framework adopted, which do not allow for a positive as­sessment of the above mentioned amendment. The article also raises the issues related to changes accounting for a criminal measure in the form of a driving ban. The article refers to the amendments to the Criminal Code, which resulted in sig­nificant strengthening of criminal liability for transport crime. The author gives a critical review and demonstrates the fallacy of certain provisions and their in­consistency with other Code stipulations. Furthermore, taking such radical meas­ures – contrary to what the amendment authors pointed out – is not justified by the increasing crime rate. The author is critical about the proposed amendments, emphasising their excessive repressiveness, which is not reasoned by the need to protect traffic safety.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu są zmiany środków karnych wynikające z nowelizacji Kodeksu karnego z 13 czerwca 2019 r. Autor analizuje konsekwencje tych zmian. W ocenie projektodawców głównym celem ma być podniesienie poziomu ochrony dzieci poprzez prawo karne. Artykuł ujawnia różne błędy i wady przyjętych rozwiązań prawnych, które nie pozwalają na pozytywną ocenę wyżej wspomnianej nowelizacji. Artykuł porusza także kwestie związane ze zmianami w zakresie środka karnego w postaci zakazu prowadzenia pojazdu. Artykuł odnosi się do zmian wprowadzonych do Kodeksu karnego, które spowodowały znaczne zwiększenie odpowiedzialności karnej sprawców przestępstw komunikacyjnych. Autor dokonuje krytycznej analizy i pokazuje wadliwość niektórych przepisów oraz ich niespójność z innymi rozwiązaniami kodeksowymi. Co więcej, podejmowanie tak radykalnych środków - wbrew temu, co zauważyli autorzy noweli, nie jest uzasadnione poziomem i dynamiką przestępstw komunikacyjnych. Autor krytycznie odnosi się do proponowanych poprawek, podkreślając ich nadmierną represyjność, która nie jest uzasadniona potrzebą ochrony bezpieczeństwa w komunikacji.  
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.