Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  election turnout
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author examines the issue of elections to the European Parliament in the context of the level of interest of voters in those elections. It presents the concept of “fi rst-order elections” and “second-order elections”, at the same time pointing out that the EP elections over 30 years are considered to be in the latter category. Attention is paid to the mechanisms by which the legislature may attempt to strengthen the level of citizens’ participation in public life and which can have a positive impact on voter turnout in the elections to the European Parliament. These include compulsory voting, holding the election on a day which is not a working day, a two-day vote, the date for the conduct of this election, the fi nancial motivation behind standing in elections or enthusiasm for the idea of the EU after recent accession.
EN
In Poland, the system of election to the European Parliament is based on a multistage procedure for the division of seats, which has departed from Polish traditional and well-established model of territorial representation. As a result, seats are not permanently assigned to constituencies and are allocated “dynamically” depending on the distribution of the votes among the constituency list of candidates. Before the election, nobody knows how many seats will be finally obtained by the region. As a consequence of this system the distribution of seats is unjust and incompatible with the principle of substantive equality and which, at the starting point, discriminates against constituencies with less than 2.2 million voters. It does not provide for the proper performance of the function of territorial representation, nor does it reward (in a consistent manner) those constituencies in which the turnout is higher than the national one, instead leading to paradoxical divisions. This system, inconsistently and without reliance on any reasonable criteria, favours or discriminate against constituencies with of the same number or percentage of those taking part in voting. There is, no rational and justified reasons to keep it.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.