Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  electronic evidence
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The concept of evidence obtained from electronic correspondence

100%
Rogalski M.
Ius Novum
|
2023
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4 ENG
1-14
PL
This article addresses cross-border cooperation between Polish law enforcement authorities and those of other European Union Member States in obtaining electronic evidence in criminal matters. It discusses provisions such as Article 589g § 1, Article 589l § 1, Article 589w § 4, and Article 589ze § 10 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP), focusing on defining electronic evidence. Currently, there are no legal definitions for these terms. The article posits that the existing definitions of electronic evidence are imprecise and lead to interpretational doubts. Therefore, it is crucial to organise the conceptual framework in the CCP by creating new definitions or clarifying existing ones. The analysis incorporates the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminalproceedings and the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Recent Developments Regarding the Conduct of Dawn Raids in Poland. The Case of Subsequent Searches of Copied IT Data

86%
Michałek-Gervais M.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2018
|
vol. 11(18)
297-310
EN
2017 brought about a significant and long awaited change in the rules applicable to dawn raids in Poland. After many years of being criticized by scholars and practitioners, the practice of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection – consisting of the subsequent review of electronic data copied during an inspection at the authority premises and without the presence of a representative of the inspected undertaking, has been finally overruled by the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection. Even thought there are still several improvements that need to be made in order to guarantee the full respect of fundamental rights of inspected undertakings in the Polish legal order, the Court ruling incontestably constitutes a significant step in strengthening the legal position of inspected undertakings in Poland.
FR
En 2017 les règles applicables aux perquisitions en Pologne ont été modifiées de façon significative et attendue depuis longtemps. Après de nombreuses années de critiques de la part d’universitaires et de praticiens, la pratique du Président de l’Office de la Concurrence et de la Protection des Consommateurs – consistant À examiner des données électroniques copies pendant une perquisition par la suite dans les locaux de l’autorité et en l’absence de représentant de l’entreprise inspectée, a finalement été renversée par la Cour de la Concurrence et de la Protection des Consommateurs. Même si plusieurs améliorations doivent encore être apportées afin de garantir le plein respect des droits fondamentaux des entreprises inspectées dans l’ordre juridique polonais, la décision de la Cour constitue incontestablement une étape importante dans le renforcement de la situation juridique des entreprises inspectées en Pologne
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pojęcie dowodów z komunikacji elektronicznej

72%
Rogalski M.
Ius Novum
|
2023
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4
1-15
EN
The subject of the article is cross-border cooperation between Polish law enforcement authorities and law enforcement authorities of other European Union Member States in the field of obtaining electronic evidence in criminal matters. The article discusses the provisions of Article 589g § 1 CCP, Article 589l § 1 CCP, Article 589w § 4 CCP and Article 589ze § 10 CCP, which concern the definition of electronic evidence, attempts to define these terms, as there are no legal definitions of them, and formulates a thesis that the current definitions of electronic evidence are not precise and raise interpretational doubts. It is therefore necessary to organise the conceptual framework used in the Code of Criminal Procedure by creating new definitions or clarifying the existing ones. The analysis carried out is taking into account the provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest współpraca transgraniczna pomiędzy polskimi organami ściągania a organami ścigania z innych krajach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej w zakresie pozyskiwania dowodów elektronicznych w sprawach karnych. W artykule zostały omówione postanowienia art. 589g § 1 k.p.k., art. 589l § 1 k.p.k., art. 589w § 4 k.p.k. i art. 589ze § 10 k.p.k., które dotyczą określeń dowodów elektronicznych. Podjęto też próbę zdefiniowania tych określeń, gdyż brak jest ich legalnej definicji. Sformułowano tezę, że obecne określenia dowodów elektronicznych nie są precyzyjne i wywołują wątpliwości interpretacyjne. Konieczne jest więc uporządkowanie siatki pojęciowej stosowanej w k.p.k. poprzez stworzenie nowych definicji lub doprecyzowanie już istniejących. Analiza jest prowadzona z uwzględnieniem postanowień rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2023/1543 z dnia 12 lipca w sprawie europejskich nakazów wydania i europejskich nakazów zabezpieczenia dowodów elektronicznych w postępowaniu karnym oraz w postępowaniu karnym wykonawczym w związku z wykonaniem kar pozbawienia wolności.
4
Content available remote

Elektronické důkazy jako výzva pro trestní proces

58%
Stupka V., Provazník J., Vostoupal J.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2022
|
vol. 161
|
issue 4
332-349
EN
This article deals with the use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. It analyzes the current legal regulation of relevant procedural tools in Czech, European and international law, and the practice of using these procedural tools by Czech law enforcement authorities. Subsequently, the article maps the main practical, technical, theoretical, and constitutional challenges that current theory and practice face in relation to this type of evidence. The aim of the article is to provoke an expert discussion on identified challenges and to create a basis for further research.
CS
Článek se věnuje problematice využití elektronických důkazů v rámci trestního řízení. Analyzuje aktuální právní úpravu procesních nástrojů v českém, evropském a mezinárodním právu a praxi využívání těchto procesních nástrojů českými orgány činnými v trestním řízení. Následně mapuje hlavní praktické, technické, teoretickoprávní a ústavněprávní výzvy, kterým aktuální teorie a praxe ve vztahu k tomuto typu důkazů čelí. Cílem článku je vyvolat odbornou diskusi k jednotlivým identifikovaným výzvám a vytvořit základ pro další výzkum.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.