Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  epoché
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Logos i Ethos
|
2020
|
vol. 53
|
issue 1
55-76
EN
The aim of the article is to show and analyze a fairly distinct convergence that occurs between the philosophical thought of Simone Weil and the phenomenological method of Edmund Husserl. Weil, inspired by the phenomenological thought, wrote several important texts. The article is to bring closer their content and indicate the originality of the interpretation of the phenomenological thought contained therein.Weil believes that the correct attitude of the cognizing subject consists of three elements: waiting, desire and attention.This attitude is very similar to that which we find in Husserl’s process of phenomenological reduction, the so-called epoché. Weil in her philosophy also uses the phrase la pensée détachée [detached thinking]. This phrase means a thought detached from reality. The form he should take in order to reach the essence of things. According to Weil, we meet with an almost identical attitude in phenomenology, where the subject suspends his judgment about reality, to “watch,” “hear” the essence of a given phenomenon.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie i analiza pewnej dość wyraźnej zbieżności, jaka zachodzi pomiędzy myślą filozoficzną Simone Weil a metodą fenomenologiczną Edmunda Husserla. Weil zainspirowana myślą fenomenologiczną napisała kilka istotnych – choć mało znanych i częściowo niedostępnych w języku polskim – tekstów poświęconych tej tematyce. Artykuł ma przybliżyć ich treść i wskazać na oryginalność zawartej tam interpretacji myśli fenomenologicznej.Weil uważa, że właściwa postawa podmiotu poznającego składa się z trzech elementów: oczekiwania, pragnienia i uwagi. Postawa ta jest bardzo podobna do tej, którą przyjmuje Husserl w procesie redukcji fenomenologicznej, tzw. epoché. Myślicielka w swej filozofii również posługuje się zwrotem la pensée détachée [oderwane myślenie]. Zwrot ten oznacza myśl oderwaną od rzeczywistości. Formę, jaką powinna ona przyjąć, chcąc dotrzeć do istoty rzeczy. Według Weil, z niemalże identyczną postawą spotykamy się w fenomenologii, gdzie podmiot zawiesza swój sąd o rzeczywistości, aby „oglądać”, „usłyszeć” istotę danego fenomenu.
EN
I consider two criticisms of Husserlian phenomenology that claim to find support in Husserl’s own Crisis. The first holds that the crisis-problematic entails a concession to the power of historical tradition that Husserl evades. The second holds that the crisis of science is a permanent feature of reason, though Husserl naively promotes its resolution. Against the first, I argue that the systematic question addressed by the historical method of Crisis is not “What can we know?” but “What are we entitled to hope?” The debate about historicism thus obscures that Husserl’s historical reconstructions represent a practical extension of phenomenological reason. Against the second, I argue for a dis-tinction between two concepts: “Krisis der Wissenschaften” and “Unwissenschaftlich-keit der Wissenschaften.” While the latter includes elements of Sinnentleerung inherent to science, the former refers to a wavering faith in science’s Lebensbedeutsamkeit that phenomenology can reasonably claim to stabilize.
EN
This text focuses on the motif of exile in the life and thought of Vilém Flusser, an author with Prague roots who developed his characteristic work devoted to the philosophy of language, the theory of communication and media after leaving Czechoslovakia. He was forced to flee from his homeland to South America, specifically Brazil, in the face of Nazism. He left there, once again by necessity, in the seventies due to a local military putsch. He experienced his second exile in the south of France. The article describes Flusser’s life-fortunes with regard to how they influenced the development of his thinking, extending his work and its reception. The second part of the text describes Flusser’s characteristic method and style of writing which, in comparison with the academic world, also appears to be “one of exile”. The third part endeavours to capture the basic approaches in thinking that are evinced across Flusser’s different philosophical subjects, among which we may also find the motif of the one standing elsewhere, outside, or at a distance.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.