Search results

1

Wybrane zagadnienia stosowania zwolnienia od kosztów sądowych w postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym w świetle orzecznictwa sądów administracyjnych

100%

Górecki P.

Studia Administracyjne

|

2014

|

issue 6

224-245

PL

Zwolnienie od kosztów sądowych ułatwia podmiotom udział w postępowaniu sądowym, co w zasadniczy sposób wpływa na ich sytuację prawną. Z drugiej strony zbyt liberalne podejście do instytucji zwolnienia od kosztów sądowych może spowodować wszczynanie zbędnych postępowań i uszczuplenia dochodów Skarbu Państwa, a co za tym idzie – zwiększenia jego wydatków na finansowanie wymiaru sprawiedliwości. Z tych powodów ustawodawca, tworząc podstawy do zwolnień od kosztów sądowych z mocy ustawy lub na wniosek podmiotu zainteresowanego, powinien wykazać się ostrożnością i rozwagą, aby cele wymiaru sprawiedliwości nie doznały uszczerbku z powodu nadmiernego fiskalizmu.

EN

Exemption from court costs facilitates participation in court proceedings for entities and significantly influences their legal situation. On the other hand, if an approach towards exemption from court fees is too liberal, it may result in opening of redundant proceedings and in a decrease of revenues of the State Treasury, and, what follows , in an increase of its expenditure on the system of justice. Due to those reason, the legislator, when creating the basis for exemptions from court fees pursuant to an act or on application of an interested entity, should show caution and common sense so that the aim of the system of justice would not suffer from excessive fiscalism.

2

Ograniczenia dopuszczalności złożenia wniosku o przyznanie prawa pomocy przed sądem administracyjnym

87%

Talaga R.

Studia Prawa Publicznego

|

2020

|

issue 4 (32)

87-108

EN

The right to a fair trial remains a common heritage of European legal culture. Such a standard has been guaranteed under the functioning system of human rights. Equally, the right to a fair trial was confirmed in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. It does not mean unlimited access to justice without bearing the costs of the initiated proceedings. As a result, mechanisms were created to bear the costs of proceedings and to release certain categories of citizens from such an obligation. In proceedings before administrative courts, it is possible to apply for the right to assistance in order to maintain the right to judicial control of public administration activities. However, the relevant request from the person involved is subject to certain formal requirements. Among other things, it should be submitted using the appropriate official form, and the information contained therein may also indicate the manner in which the request was submitted. An application for granting the right to assistance may be submitted in the course of court proceedings or before their initiation. However, such a statutory definition of the moment for submitting an application for the right to assistance requires clarification. In fact, such a requestcannot be made before the individual has been entitled to submit the appropriate appeal to the administrative court. Failure to comply with such a requirement results in the fact that the application submitted for the right to assistance does not generate any legal effects. A person applying for aid from the state is not yet obliged to bear court costs. There is also no need to provide such persons with professional legal assistance in proceedings before administrative authorities. This situation makes it impossible to grant the right to assistance due to the systemic limitations. In effect, such a procedure under the application for granting the right to assistance is discontinued as being deemed redundant. Moreover, premature submission of an application for the right to assistance may also reveal additionally that the substantive examination of the complaint or objection is inadmissible.

3

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 20. października 2011 r., IV KK 137/11

75%

Kończal M.

Przegląd Prawniczy Europejskiego Stowarzyszenia Studentów Prawa ELSA Poland

|

2013

|

issue 1

155-160

EN

The Gloss endorses Supreme Court's judgment from 20 X 2011 r.,( IV KK 137/11), which relates to extent of duty to redress the damage caused by unlawful arrest and to that, if it is possible, in proceeding regulated by the 58th section of Code of Criminal Procedure, to obtain reimbursement of legal representation costs under Article 632§ 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Glossator held’s that the Supreme Court has rightly held that the damage must also take into account monetary liabilities, which drew family wrongly detained person to cover the cost of living during imprisonment. Compensation should cover entire damage and redress entire moral injury, which were suffered by detainee. In determining the amount of both compensation and redress all the circumstances of the case should be considered. The applicant in proceedings for damages should receive reimbursement of legal representation cost.

Refine search results

1 Przegląd Prawniczy Europejskiego Stowarzyszenia Studentów Prawa ELSA Poland

1 Studia Administracyjne

1 Studia Prawa Publicznego

1 Górecki P.

1 Kończal M.

1 Talaga R.

1 2020

1 2014

1 2013

Wybrane zagadnienia stosowania zwolnienia od kosztów sądowych w postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym w świetle orzecznictwa sądów administracyjnych

Ograniczenia dopuszczalności złożenia wniosku o przyznanie prawa pomocy przed sądem administracyjnym

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 20. października 2011 r., IV KK 137/11