Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  existential thomism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Étienne Gilson and Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec notice essential elements that determine philosophical realism. Such discovery allows a philosopher to build realistic concept of object, method and objective of metaphysical cognition thus standing against idealistic tendencies. Realistic object of metaphysical cognition is characterized by realism (intelligibility, self-evidence, extrasubjectiveness), universalism (unity and pluralism), neutralism (beings constituted in the existence considered as a real element of cognition). Realistic method of cognition according to Krąpiec and Gilson has to reject irrational understanding of common sense, abstractionism and cartesianism, while making use of thomistic understanding of common sense, existential judgements and metaphysical separation. Realistic objective of metaphysical cognition is oriented on cognition of causality, cognition of the first cause, understanding of the four Aristotle's causes, recta ratio and recta voluntas and analogous cognition. Due to determinants of realism mentioned before, it is possible to practice thomistic philosophy based on riches of the world given in the cognition.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Zapomniany spór o tomizm

88%
EN
The aim of the article is the forgotten dispute regarding the world-view value of Thomism, taking place in the early 1960s in the Polish Catholic press. I attempt to present and evaluate the theses and arguments of both sides (critics as well as advocates of Thomism). My claim is that the dispute anticipated the loud discussion with Thomism initiated by J. Tischner in the 1970s and designated the areas of confrontation, as well as, the content and the character of the arguments for and against Thomism.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest zapomniany spór na temat światopoglądowej wartości tomizmu, toczący się na początku lat sześćdziesiątych XX wieku w polskiej prasie katolickiej. Próbuję przedstawić tezy i argumenty obu stron oraz dokonać ich oceny. Twierdzę, że spór ten antycypował głośną dyskusję z tomizmem, podjętą przez J. Tischnera w latach siedemdziesiątych – wyznaczył obszary tej konfrontacji oraz treść i charakter argumentacji za i przeciw.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.