Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  face mask
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Impact of face mask use during the non-stress test in pregnancy

100%
Gursoy A., Tekbas E. D.
European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
|
2023
|
issue 1
114-119
EN
Introduction and aim. Face masks used to protect against the COVID 19 pandemic have become a daily routine. The aim of this study was to examine the possible effects of mask use on non-stress test (NST) results during pregnancy. Material and methods. A total of 951 pregnant women were included in the study. They were divided into two groups as those who wear masks and those who do not. These pregnant women were also divided into subgroups as preterm and term periods. Results. The mean age of the pregnant women was 31.2±4.9 and their gestational weeks were between 34+0 and 40+6. There was no significant difference between 34 and 37 gestational weeks pregnants in terms of FHR, reactivity, non-reactivity, deceleration, FHR category distribution and number of fetal movements (p>0.05). The variability was significantly higher in those who did not wear a mask (p37 gestational weeks there was no significant difference in terms of FHR, reactivity, non-reactivity, variability, deceleration and FHR category distribution (p>0.05). The number of fetal movements was significantly (p<0.05) lower in the mask-wearing group. Conclusion. Mask use should be considered in NSTs where variability is reduced or fetal movements are low. Thus, misinterpretation of the NST can be avoided.
2
Content available remote

Rozmyślania nad maską

88%
Kocur M.
Pamiętnik Teatralny
|
2021
|
issue 2(278)
123-132
EN
Instead of a typical review of a research monograph, this article proposes deliberations on selected motifs from Wojciech Dudzik’s book Maska w kulturze współczesnej Europy: Teorie i praktyka [The Mask in Contemporary European Culture: Theories and Practice] (Warsaw, 2020). Although this subjective choice of themes only partially reflects the variety of problems discussed by Dudzik, thise article situates a number of issues in broader contexts: (1) Recent research has shown a surprising ambivalence towards the pandemic face mask as a protection against infection. (2) Present-day devil masks seem to continue the ancient tradition of the mask as a fear-inducing object. (3) European performative practices ignore the insides of masks, unlike in the East, where they are important to actors, stimulating spiritual contact with previous wearers. (4) Sight bimodality is crucial for performing in a mask. (5) In the digital world, the biometric mask takes power over the individual’s bodily identity.
3
Content available remote

Nouzové zákonodárství a roušky:

63%
Koudelka Z.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2020
|
vol. 159
|
issue 12
956-968
EN
The text deals with the position of emergency legislation, in other words the possibility of creating legal provisions to replace laws. The article contains a brief history of regulations with the power of law issued by the government. The subject of the article is also the measures of the government and the Ministry of Health in connection with the coronavirus crisis. The article concludes that emergency legislation in exceptional times is a necessity for the state, but it can only be applied if the constitutional order allows it. Under the current legislation, the imposition of duties by the executive is possible only in accordance with the Constitutional Security Act. The conditions for such an impostion of duties are: a declared state of emergency and the government is responsible for the decision. Measures of the Ministry of Health setting out obligations that are not explicitly mentioned in the law have no constitutional support. The article criticizes the fact that the government’s crisis measures, which impose obligations on citizens, do not take the form of a legal regulation, even though they are materially assessed as a legal regulation by the Constitutional Court.
CS
Text se zabývá postavením nouzového zákonodárství, tedy možnosti tvorby právních předpisů nahrazujících zákony. Článek obsahuje krátkou historii předpisů s mocí zákona vydávaných vládou. Předmětem článku jsou i opatření vlády a Ministerstva zdravotnictví v souvislosti s koronavirovou krizí. Článek dochází k závěru, že nouzové zákonodárství v době výjimečné je pro stát nutností, ale může být uplatněno jen, když tak připouští ústavní řád. Za současné právní úpravy je stanovení povinností výkonnou mocí možné jen podle ústavního zákona o bezpečnosti. Podmínkou je vyhlášený nouzový stav a příslušná k rozhodnutí je vláda. Opatření Ministerstva zdravotnictví stanovící povinnosti, které zákon výslovně nezmiňuje, nemají ústavní oporu. Článek kritizuje skutečnost, že krizová opatření vlády, která stanoví povinnosti občanům, nemají formu právního předpisu, byť jsou jako právní předpis Ústavním soudem materiálně posuzována.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.