Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  field of art
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Rozważania przestawione w tym artykule sytuują się na pograniczu socjologii sztuki i socjologii emocji. Analizowana jest problematyka emocji związanych z istnieniem dzieła sztuki i pojawianiem się jego nowych wersji, pastiszów, adaptacji, co wymaga, zgodnie z koncepcją Pierre’a Bourdieu, odwołania się do miejsca w polu dóbr symbolicznych (awangarda, klasyka, kultura masowa) oraz podmiotów w tym polu (twórców, krytyków, odbiorców). Stosowane jest wielokrotne studium przypadku; w tym tekście przedmiotem analiz jest Mona Liza Leonarda da Vinci oraz jej wersje awangardowe i rozrywkowe, poczynając od Marcela Duchampa i Salvadora Dali, Fernanda Botero, Jerzego Dudy-Gracza (ujęcia artystów awangardowych) aż do licznych ujęć twórców nieznanych, ukazujących Monę Lizę jako kulturystkę, rugbystkę, łysą, utrefioną, małpę, kocicę lub wcielenie wielkich uczonych, polityków, gwiazd popkultury. Mona Liza Leonarda da Vinci sytuowała się zawsze w polu kultury prawomocnej, stanowiąc idealny przejaw wartości uznawanych, odczuwanych i realizowanych – według terminologii Stanisława Ossowskiego. Tysiące pastiszów, o różnej wartości artystycznej, usytuowanych w trzech różnych subpolach dóbr symbolicznych, świadczy o żywotności dzieła i „grach z kanonem”, choć budzi zróżnicowane emocje odbiorców współczesnych.
EN
The consideration is a borderline case combining sociology of art and sociology of emotions. The problems concerning emotions associated with a piece of art as such, its new versions, pastiches, and adaptations have been analyzed in the paper. The analysis involves reference to the position in the field of symbolic goods (the avant-garde, classic, mass culture) and the subjects in this field (creative artists, critics, recipients). A multiple case study has been applied and it is essential to use the reproductions of the pieces of art that have been discussed (Mona Liza by Leonardo da Vinci, Marcel Duchamp, Salvador Dali, Fernando Botero placed in avant-garde field, and numerous versions done by unknown creators from mass culture field).
EN
The objective of this paper is to identify and define the main differences in modern Western and Classical Indian approaches to the theory of art, and by extension to the work of art itself. It is important in research on the history of art to avoid a cultural bias resulting from different theoretical approaches towards art and the basis of visual culture. Three main areas are examined: the classification of art or art disciplines, the theory of the senses and strategies in the perception of art. The first part analyses concerns about the origin of art, its boundaries and inner divisions. This serves top identify the scope of the Field of Art, connections between disciplines (theatre, music, painting, sculpture, etc.), and their position in the Art World. The following Sanskrit treatises serve as a basis: Nāṭya-śāstra, Kāma-sūtra, Viṣṇu-dharmôttara-purāṇa. A significant distinction can be found in the theory of the senses. Based on Saṃyutta Nikāya, Nyāya-sūtra, Vaiśeṣika- sūtra, etc. classical concepts of sensual perception and their roles are examined, with special emphasis on the position of the mind (manas) as a sixth sense or inner organ linked to senses. With that background, a brief analysis of the theory of taste (rasa), including the roles of emotion (bhāva) and mind (manas), is presented.
EN
The author’s main aim is to present the lomography movement: an international society whose identity is built on the old Soviet Lomo camera (and camera equipment with similar technical parameters). The author indicates the various possible interpretive and analytical contexts whereby the movement could be set in the broader social environment and viewed in categories of marketing strategy or of activities with the hallmarks of artistic work. Lomography’s characteristics and the questions about its identity that arise require considering the border between the movement and the art and photographic worlds: to what degree do these worlds intertwine and to what degree are they constructed in mutual opposition?
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.