Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  free market economy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The present paper argues that employees' responsibility for performing certain duties effectively and producing certain results is very important under curent economic conditions. The effectiveness of an employee's performance in a free market economy is closely connected with the employee's professional development. This is why it is vital anticipate both effective self-fulfilment in terms of performing professional duties and achievement of particular professional results/success. Accomplishment of personal and corporate aims is significant, too. What also matters is one's awareness of the responsibility for one's performance at work, ongoing development of one's skills/competence and self-assessment in terms of one's professional potential.
PL
Inspiracją dla rozważań zawartych w artykule stały się publicznoprawne restrykcje działalności komorników wprowadzone ustawą z dnia 9 kwietnia 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o komornikach sądowych i egzekucji. Ich wyrazem są normy zawarte w art. 8 ust. 8 ustawy o komornikach sądowych i egzekucji, stosownie do których komornik wybrany przez wierzyciela odmawia jednak wszczęcia egzekucji, wykonania postanowienia o udzieleniu zabezpieczenia lub podjęcia innych czynności wchodzących w zakres jego ustawowych zadań, jeżeli: 1) w zakresie prowadzonych przez niego egzekucji zaległość przekracza sześć miesięcy; 2) wpływ wszystkich spraw w danym roku przekroczył 5000, a skuteczność w zakresie prowadzonych przez niego egzekucji w roku poprzednim nie przekroczyła 35%; 3) wpływ wszystkich spraw w danym roku przekroczył 10 000. Celem opracowania stało się zbadanie zgodności przyjętych rozwiązań legislacyjnych z wartościami konstytucyjnymi wyrażanymi w art. 2 oraz art. 20 i art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji. Wiodącym podejściem badawczym w dyscyplinie prawo jest logiczno-lingwistyczna wykładnia komunikatu o stanie reguł sformalizowanych. Skoro zatem podstawowym materiałem weryfikacyjnym przedstawionego zagadnienia uczyniono regulacje prawne, to okoliczność ta w naturalny sposób determinowała oparcie badań na metodzie formalno-dogmatycznej jako najefektywniejszej w procesie egzegezy norm prawnych. Przeprowadzona analiza wskazanych rozwiązań prawnych pozwoliła na ich krytyczną ocenę zarówno z perspektywy zgodności z normami Konstytucji, jak też z uwagi na ochronę praw komorników i wierzycieli.
EN
The considerations included in the article were inspired by public law restrictions on the activities of bailiffs introduced by the Act of 9 April 2015 amending the Act on Bailiffs and Enforcement. They are embodied by the standards in Article 8 paragraph 8 of the Act on Bailiffs and Enforcement, according to which the bailiff selected by the creditor refuses a request for enforcement or preservation of a claim or to take other action which is within the scope of his or her statutory tasks if: 1) there is a backlog of more than six months in the enforcement proceedings being conducted by him or her; 2) the number of all received cases in a given year exceeded 5,000, and the effectiveness of the enforcement proceedings in the previous year did not exceed 35%; 3) the number of all received cases in a given year exceeded 10,000. The aim of the article was to examine the compatibility of the adopted legislative solutions with the constitutional values expressed in Article 2 and 20 and Article 45 paragraph 1 of the Constitution. The leading research approach in the discipline of law is linguo-logical interpretation of a status of formalized rules. So if the legal regulations became the basic material for verification of the presented issue, this circumstance naturally determined the use of formal-dogmatic method for the research as the most efficient one in the process of exegesis of legal norms. The conducted analysis of indicated legal solutions allowed their critical evaluation from the perspective of compatibility with the norms of the Constitution, as well as in regard to the protection of the rights of bailiffs and creditors.
Human Affairs
|
2011
|
vol. 21
|
issue 3
304-315
EN
The luxury-versus-necessity controversy is primarily concerned with the importance of civil and political rights vis-à-vis economic and social rights. The viewpoint of political leaders of many developing and newly industrialized countries, especially China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Indonesia is that civil and political rights are luxuries that only rich nations can afford. The United Nations, transnational civil society and the Western advanced countries oppose this viewpoint on normative and empirical grounds. While this controversy is far from over, new challenges of “evidence” and “marketization” are emerging. The first calls for a narrative on the history of civil and political rights in the West in the comparative context of the Industrial Revolution and the East Asian Miracle and China’s economic growth. The effects of the recent financial crisis and insulation of China from the Arab Spring further deepen this challenge. The marketization challenge looks at this controversy from the social exclusion angle. It argues that the basic needs covered by the minimum human rights agenda are becoming luxuries in a real sense for those who do not have the power to purchase these needs from the market.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.