Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  fundamental ecclesiology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wiarygodność Kościoła w dzisiejszej Polsce

100%
Kaucha K.
Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne
|
2018
|
issue 33
67-82
EN
There are two purposes of this article: the first one - to clarify the meaning of the term ‘credibility of the Church in contemporary Poland’ from a theological perspective, and the second one - to describe the basic signs of such credibility and the difficulties they are facing. The article consists of three parts and a conclusion. The first part deals with the theological understanding of the Church’s credibility in contemporary Poland in the light of new researches and inspirations offered by Joseph Ratzinger’s ecclesiology and by the book Oblicza Kościoła katolickiego w Polsce. 1050. rocznicaChrztu [Features of the Catholic Church in Poland. The 1050th Anniversary of the Christening] (ed. by J. Mastej, K. Kaucha, P. Borto, Lublin 2016). The second part is focused on the signs of the Church’s credibility in Poland (sign of Peter, of the Apostolic Collegium, of unity, of holiness, of universality, of apostolicity, agapetological, praxeological, martyriological, and culture-creative), which started to be described about 25 years ago by Rev. Marian Rusecki, who was co-founder and the most excellent representative of the Lublin School of Fundamental Theology. The third part presents some new signs of the Church’s credibility in Poland according to the author of the article (charitable, staurological, resurrectional, paschal, anthropological-vocational, of freedom, of the priority of the Spirit and spiritual life, of peace and reconciliation, of protest, of the faith’s pure- ness). In the conclusion the author underlines the values of the semeiological method in describing and testing the credibility of the Church in contemporary Poland.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Strukturalna wiarygodność Kościoła w eklezjologicznych poglądach ks. Mariana Ruseckiego

94%
Królikowski P.
Resovia Sacra : Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej
|
2015
|
issue 22
177-210
EN
This article presents question of structural credibility of the Church based on ecclesiological thought of rev. Marian Rusecki, professor of fundamental theology and the founder of Fundamental Theology School of Lublin. Though Rusecki did not work out fully comprehensive fundamental ecclesiology, he in his researches investigate many issues connected with credibility of Church. First of all Rusecki pointed to the divine-human structure of Church. He motivates this structure in reference to the paschal ecclesiogenesis, which in turn indicates on essence of the Church – the communicaton of Revelation and the salvation in time and space. Rusecki introduced theological conceptions of Church: salvation-historical, semeiotical, personalistic. They serve to show realization Church's essence in temporary, spatial and deep (from below) dimensions. These dimensions and these conceptions of the Church are connected each other and indicate that the Church is credible and true. Salvation-historical conception presents Church as herald of Revelation in temporal dimension. This article shows temporary frames of Church and its permanent identity and continuity in time from creation to the end of time. Attention was turned on Tradition, Magisterium Ecclesiae and permanent ecclesiogenesis which make possible communication of Revelation by the Church in time. Semiotical conception of the Church refers to spatial dimension and shows Church as salvific community, as sign of Christ, and sign of salvation. It has two breadths – Church membership and relationship to the Church. In deep (from below) dimension, based on of personalistic conception, the Church is shown as the environment in which the man can fulfill his orientation towards transcendence and fully realize his personal existence in Jesus Christ and His Church. Church as witness of Revelation and Christ leads a man to conversion and to faith, and include him in the sacramental sign of the Church. Church has transformative influence on man and on the various dimensions of his life. But members of the Church in their live are witness of Jesus Christ and the Church too. This part of article presents also axiological argumentation for credibility of the Church. These dimensions of Church portray fulfillment Church's essence and realization of its mission, thereby structural credibility of Church becomes justify. Article pays attention also on conditions of the cognizance of the structural credibility of the Church.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Podstawy prymatu oraz misja Biskupa Rzymu według kardynała Gerharda L. Müllera

94%
Artemiuk P.
|
2020
|
vol. 67
|
issue 9
37-51
EN
Pytanie o miejsce i rolę papieża w Kościele katolickim bardzo wyraźnie pojawia się w myśli teologicznej kard. G.L. Müllera (ur. 1947). Niemiecki hierarcha, podejmując refleksję nad tym zagadnieniem, czyni to w sposób uporządkowany i systematyczny, łącząc wątki dogmatyczne ze spojrzeniem fundamentalnoteologicznym. Papiestwo, zdaniem G.L. Müllera, jest faktem historycznym, który posiada swoje źródło w tajemnicy Objawienia. Podejmując refleksję nad tym zagadnieniem, obecnym w myśli teologa, autor odwołuje się do jego kluczowych tekstów, przede wszystkim do pracy Der Papst. Sendung und Auftrag opublikowanej w roku 2017, a także do wypowiedzi zawartych w tomie rozmów, jakie z kardynałem przeprowadził red. Paweł Lisicki. W prezentowanym artykule autor ukazuje najpierw interpretację klasycznych tekstów prymacjalnych, proponowaną przez kard. Müllera. Następnie omawia najwcześniejsze świadectwa Tradycji, do których odwołuje się niemiecki teolog. W końcu zwraca uwagę na misję, jaka wypływa z papieskiego urzędu. W zakończeniu wyciąga wnioski w perspektywie eklezjologii fundamentalnej.
4

The Achievements of the Lublin School of Fundamental Theology in the Field of Ecclesiology

94%
Kaucha K.
Roczniki Teologiczne
|
2018
|
vol. 65
|
issue 9: Teologia fundamentalna i religiologia - English Online Version
83-98
EN
Academic research in the field of ecclesiology has been conducted at John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (CUL) from the beginning of its existence, among others, in the Department of Fundamental Theology headed in 1918 by Rev. Piotr Kremer. Research intensified after the creation of the second Department of Fundamental Theology—Ecclesiology (on June 23, 1958), which in the years 1964–91 was headed by Rev. Stanisław Nagy (Cardinal since 2003). Along with this, the Lublin School of Fundamental Theology developed, whose most prominent contributor was Rev. Marian Rusecki. The aim of this article is to present the achievements of the Lublin center (authors, works, research problems, its development) in the field of ecclesiology. The article will not repeat the contents of other articles included in this volume but will be composed of the following sections: (1) the ecclesiological contents before the establishment of the Lublin School of Fundamental Theology, (2) the ecclesiological contents in the works of Rev. Edward Kopeć, (3) the ecclesiological achievements of Rev. Stanisław Nagy and his students, (4) the ecclesiological achievements of Rev. Marian Rusecki and his students, and (5) a conclusion.
5

Dorobek lubelskiej szkoły teologii fundamentalnej w zakresie eklezjologii

71%
Kaucha K.
Roczniki Teologiczne
|
2018
|
vol. 65
|
issue 9: Teologia fundamentalna i religiologia
75-90
EN
Scientific research in the field of ecclesiology have been conducted at John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (KUL) from the beginning of its existence, among others, in the Department of Fundamental Theology headed from 1918 by Rev. Piotr Kremer. The research intensified after the creation of the second Department of Fundamental Theology – Ecclesiology (on 23 June 1958), which in the years 1964-91 was headed by Rev. Stanisław Nagy (Cardinal from 2003), along with the development of the Lublin School of Fundamental Theology, to which Rev. Marian Rusecki was the most prominent contributor. The aim of this article is to present the achievements of the Lublin centre (authors, works, research problems, its development) in the field of ecclesiology. The article will not repeat the content of other articles included in this volume1 and it will be composed of the following sections: (1) the ecclesiological contents before the establishment of the Lublin School of Fundamental Theology, (2) the ecclesiological contents in the works of Rev. Edward Kopeć, (3) the ecclesiological achievements of Rev. Stanisław Nagy and his students, (4) the ecclesiological achievements of Rev. Marian Rusecki and his students, and (5) conclusion.
PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie dorobku (autorów, dzieł, zagadnień, przemian) lubelskiego ośrodka teologii fundamentalnej w zakresie eklezjologii. Artykuł składa się z następujących punktów: treści eklezjologiczne przed zainicjowaniem lubelskiej szkoły teologii fundamentalnej (1), treści eklezjologiczne w twórczości ks. Edwarda Kopcia (2), eklezjologiczny dorobek ks. Stanisława Nagyego i jego uczniów (3), eklezjologiczny dorobek ks. Mariana Ruseckiego i jego uczniów (4) oraz zakończenia. W podsumowaniu stwierdzono, że w badaniach w zakresie eklezjologii zachodziły przemiany analogiczne do przemian w europejskiej eklezjologii katolickiej na przestrzeni ostatnich stu lat. Najpierw była to eklezjologia dogmatyczno-apologetyczna i polemiczna z prawosławiem rosyjskim (ks. P. Kremer), potem – u ks. E. Kopcia i ks. S. Nagyego – tradycyjna, utrzymana jeszcze w duchu apologetyki intelektualistycznej. W późniejszym okresie ks. Nagy przekształcał ją w eklezjologię posoborową o coraz wyraźniejszym profilu teologicznym i ekumenicznym, co czynił też ks. R. Łukaszyk. Największy wkład wniósł ks. M. Rusecki, który synchronizował eklezjologię z chrystologią (u ks. Kopcia i ks. Nagyego były one niezależne) i poszerzył argumentację na rzecz wiarygodności Kościoła. Jego dorobek jest rozwijany przez jego uczniów.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.