Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: geografia nazewnicza

Sort By:

Limit search:

Deanthroponymic Potamonyms in the Vistula River Basin (Methodological Problems and Typology of Names)

100%

Bijak U.

Onomastica

2019

vol. 63

145-156

Deanthroponymic Potamonyms in the Vistula River Basin (Methodological Problems and Typology of Names) Water names, using the genetic-motivational criteria, can be divided into two superior groups: deappellative and deproprial hydronyms. Among the hydronyms derived from proper names, one can distinguish between the detoponymic and deanthroponymic. The names of flowing waters from anthroponyms are the subject of this article. Preliminary statistical data regarding deanthroponymic potamonyms in the Vistula river basin, their chronology, naming models, word formation bases and geographical distribution are presented. The results of the analysis show that the deanthroponymic potamonyms account for approximately 6.8% of the names of flowing waters of the Vistula river basin, estimated at more than 13,500. They appear sporadically in documents as early as in the 13th century, with only 12% visible until the 16th century, with most of them not being noticed until the 19th and 20th centuries. Such a statistical distribution is typical for the names of the flowing waters of that basin. Deanthroponymic names of rivers represent a variety of naming models, but most often appear as a part of compound names created with the suffix -ów, one-word formations with the same suffix and derivatives from the suf. -ka. They mainly identify objects located between the Soła River and the Dunajec River, especially in the Dunajec River basin, so in mountainous and submontainous areas, as K. Rymut claimed. The basis of such potamonyms are mainly personal names with different motivations, rarely being ethnonyms and first names.

Regionalne zróżnicowanie ilościowe imiennictwa w Polsce

89%

Swoboda P.

Socjolingwistyka

2015

issue 29

21-37

Artykuł dotyczy różnic ilościowych w imiennictwie poszczególnych regionów Polski w latach 1951–2010. Celem było sprawdzenie, czy dane ilościowe dla regionów są zróżnicowane, czy układają się w zwarte obszary geograficzne oraz czy zróżnicowanie międzyregionalne ulegało zmianom w badanym okresie. Do oceny tych różnic użyte zostały wybrane wskaźniki bogactwa leksykalnego stosowane w pracach z zakresu statystyki leksykalnej. Impulsem do podjęcia tego zagadnienia były zaobserwowane wcześniej wyraźne różnice w dystrybucji przestrzennej imion ze względu na ich cechy jakościowe. Badanie wykazało, że także w świetle danych ilościowych występuje czasowe i geograficzne zróżnicowanie w nadawaniu imion w Polsce.

The article examines the quantitative differentiation in naming in the various Polish regions during the period of 1951–1960. The aim was to check whether the quantitative data for names are regionally differentiated, and has the interregional differences changed during the period considered. Selected measures of lexical richness (originally applied in the field of lexical statistics) were used to evaluate these differences. The direct reason for considering this case were the previously observed clear spatial patterns of first names with regard to its qualitative features. Present study has shown that also in the case of quantitative data there are some temporal and spatial differentiation in naming practices in Poland.

Refine search results

1 Onomastica

1 Socjolingwistyka

1 Bijak U.

1 Swoboda P.

1 2019

1 2015

Search results

Deanthroponymic Potamonyms in the Vistula River Basin (Methodological Problems and Typology of Names)

Regionalne zróżnicowanie ilościowe imiennictwa w Polsce