Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  gnostycy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Verbum Vitae
|
2004
|
vol. 6
185-204
PL
L’argomento della „Chiesa” nei gnostici puo essere considerato a partire dalle fonti dei polemisti antignostici, anzitutto di Ireneo di Lione e di Tertuliano, e riferendosi agli scritti dei gnostici cristiani, inoltre alle opere originali, ossia ai testi di Nag Hammadi. Le questione „Chiesa” riguarda la societa religiosa, alla quale appartengono i cristiani, e l’interpretazione teologica di questa realta. I gnostici cristiani venivano stigmatizzati dai polemisti come eretici, ma la loro appartenenza alla Chiesa non puo essere in modo conclusivo spiegata. Da una parte soltanto nella polemica con loro si rivelano i confini dottrinali di questa appartenenza, dall’altra i gnostici cristiani stessi non costituivano una societa distinta (fuori della Chiesa), al contrario, si consideravano la piu spirituale parte della Chiesa, („pneumatica”), inserendosi nella piu stretta cerchia della Chiesa. Nell’opinione dei gnostici la gente „della Chiesa”, che veniva definita come gli uomini sensuali („psichici”), nell’appartenenza alla Chiesa si poteva salvarsi, oppure costituiva la sua piu esterna parte, giungendo ad un genere di salvezza inferiore, corrispondente al grado minore dell’appartenenza ad essa. I gnostici svilupparono l'interpretazione teologica della realta ecclesiale nella continuazione dell’idea primitiva cristiana (giudeocristiana) della Chiesa preesistente, esprimendo sia la sua divina ed eterna origine, che la sua destinazione. I gnostici si richiamavano all’idea della Chiesa come „corpo” di Cristo. Per lo sviluppo dell’idea della preesistenza della Chiesa e della sua concezione come „corpo” (eventualmente delle „membra”) di Cristo le nuove fonti nella biblioteca gnostica di Nag Hammadi meritano non solo un’indagine da parte dei storici della Chiesa, ma anche un’attenzione da parte degli esegeti.
2
100%
Vox Patrum
|
2009
|
vol. 53
483-494
EN
Im Aufsatz wird die Wirkung der 1Kor 15, 50 in der einigen Nag-Hammadi- Schriften und in der Iraenaus’s Polemik gegen Gnostikern untersucht. Einfluss der paulinischen Terminologie und die Lehre über die Auferstehung wir am Beispiel Röm 6, 17; 6, 4-6, Eph 2, 5; Kol 2, 12 aufgedeckt. Die Gnostiker und Iraeneus haben auch einigermassen die gemeinsame Terminologie benutzt.
EN
Zum Thema des Portrats des Gnostikers nach Klemens von Alexandrien existieren viele Ausarbeitungen.
PL
Dyskusje na temat możliwości mistycznego zjednoczenia z Bogiem były w większości nieobecne w pismach Ojców Kościoła przed końcem II wieku. Dopiero u schyłku tego wieku pojęcie komunii z Bogiem stało się przedmiotem zainteresowania zarówno literatury wczesnochrześcijańskiej, jak i gnostyckiej. Ireneusz z Lyonu był jednym z pierwszych pisarzy chrześcijańskich, który podjął krytyczną refleksję nad tym zagadnieniem. Twierdził, że uczestnictwo w boskości jest możliwe tylko w prawowiernych Kościołach i wymaga trzech kluczowych elementów: życia przeżywanego w relacji z Duchem Bożym, we wspólnocie z prawdziwymi ludźmi Bożymi, i jednocześnie dającymi świadectwo religijnej pobożności i cnoty. Podczas gdy gnostyckie koncepcje zjednoczenia kładły często nacisk na zastrzeżoną, tajemną wiedzę, paradygmat Ireneusza oferował publicz­ną, progresywną drogę wznoszenia się do Boga.
EN
Discussion related to the potential for mystical union with God was largely absent from the writings of the Church Fathers prior to the late-second century. Toward the end of that century, however, the concept of communion with God emerged as a topic of interest in both early Christian and Gnostic literature. St. Irenaeus of Lyons was among the earliest Christian writers to critically reflect on the subject. He argued that participation with the divine was possible only in the “orthodox” churches and required three key elements: a life lived in connection to the Spirit of God, in community with the true people of God, while bearing evidence of godly piety and virtue. Whereas Gnostic conceptions of communion frequently included an emphasis on the reception of an exclusive, secret gnosis, Irenaeus’ paradigm offered a public, progressive path of ascent to God.
EN
The term to kerygma in Ciemens of Alexandria's writings means both an action performed in time and the contents, substance, subject of the Good News the contents of the Gospel. The conveyor of the kerygmat is a word, which can be said or written. On the basis of this assumption Clemens talks about two kinds of kerygma: oral and written. In the times of persecution the written transmission accomplished the principle of kerygmat universality in a fuller way, as it reached ail environments, also the circles that were unfavorable or hostile towards Christianity.
PL
The term 'to kerygma' in Clemens of Alexandria's writings means both an action performed in time and the contents, substance, subject of the Good News the contents of the Gospel. The conveyor of the kerygmat is a word, which can be said or written. On the basis of this assumption Clemens talks about two kinds of kerygma: oral and written. In the times of persecution the written transmission accomplished the principle of kerygmat universality in a fuller way, as it reached ail environments, also the circles that were unfavorable or hostile towards Christianity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.