Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  habermas
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Artykuł poświęcono krytycznej dyskusji nad normatywnymi modelami sfery publicznej. Autor przeciwstawia szerokiemu rozumieniu tej kategorii wąskie modele sfery publicznej. Korzystając z typologii konfrontującej koncepcje Hannah Arendt, modele liberalne Johna Rawlsa i Bruce’a Ackermana oraz dyskursywny model sfery publicznej Jürgena Habermasa, dyskusja koncentruje się na problemie ekskluzji poszczególnych kategorii społecznych lub elementów dyskursu z domeny publicznej. Zastana polisemiczność tytułowej kategorii nie zostaje bynajmniej przezwyciężona, jednak konkluzje przeprowadzonego wywodu wskazują na wyższość możliwie najbardziej inkluzywnego konceptualizowania sfery publicznej.
EN
The paper is devoted to a critical discussion of normative models of the public sphere. It juxtaposes the broad understanding of the concept with narrow definitions of the public sphere. Using a typology confronting the approaches of Hannah Arendt, liberal models of John Rawls and Bruce Ackerman, as well as the discursive model of the public sphere put forward by Jürgen Habermas, the discussion is focused on the problem of exclusion of particular social categories or elements of discourse from the public domain. The polysemy of the public sphere notion has not been overcome, however, the conclusions of the proposed analysis point to the preference towards possibly most inclusive ways of conceptualising the public sphere.
2
71%
EN
Erving Goffman’s emphasis on impression management in everyday life means that for the most part persons offer only partial or incomplete glimpses of themselves. Indeed, under specifiable conditions self-presentations may take the form of a negational self. If negational selves exist at the person or individual level, then they must also exist at the collective level (that is, if we are to take seriously such notions as the social mind, collective representations, or even culture). Understandings of how this negational self appears and is produced at various analytical levels (micro, meso, and macro) can be anchored via a conceptual schema which merges Goffman’s own identity typology with the three-world model of Jürgen Habermas by way of Talcott Parsons.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.