Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  hermeneutic of rupture
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
The article is an attempt to answer the question about the relation between tradition and the development of theological cognition. The church from the first centuries was aware that allegiance to the council tenets exceeds a technical repetition of council`s formulas. It is clear that a belief in dogma assumes openness to both the past and the future.In the article two approaches to tradition are criticized: archeological and enthusiastic. The first one is linked with attempt to end the possibility of adding to a developing tradition further at any point in history; the second one is a result of conviction that currents form of doctrine and church are exactly what is wanted by God.In reference to K. Rahner, J. Ratzinger and W. Kasper the typological­‑sacramental meaning of the tradition was proposed. It lets us – basing on the statements of the Vatican II – overcome a progressivist hermeneutic of rupture and go toward a hermeneutic of continuity and to the real reform of the church. In other words, it means that the process of reception and realization of Jesus` teaching and of the history of Christianity lives on and every epoch, every culture and every generation has a task to deepen and to better understand all revelation given to us by Christ. It must be done with a sensitivity to the historical, cultural and religious contexts of every period of history including the present.
2
45%
Teologia w Polsce
|
2016
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
141-164
EN
The article focuses on the issue of proper interpretation of the Second Vatican Council’s inheritance. Benedict XVI believes a “hermeneutic of reform” is an alternative to a “hermeneutic of rupture”. Nevertheless, the expected “hermeneutic of reform” has received different interpretations. That’s why a relevant hermeneutic of the “hermeneutic of reform” must be applied. The author presumes that an issue of the Bible interpretation, which is in accord with the postulated by Benedict XVI “hermeneutic of faith”, is a practical expression of applying the “hermeneutic of reform”. Therefore, the „hermeneutic of reform” has been interpreted in the light of the “hermeneutic of faith”.
PL
Benedykt XVI polecał interpretować Sobór Watykański II w optyce „hermeneutyki reformy”. Jednak oczekiwana przez niego hermeneutyka soborowego dziedzictwa sama doczekała się różnych interpretacji. Gdzie w takim razie poszukiwać odpowiedniej hermeneutyki „hermeneutyki reformy”?
Teologia w Polsce
|
2016
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
141-164
PL
Benedykt XVI polecał interpretować Sobór Watykański II w optyce „hermeneutyki reformy”. Jednak oczekiwana przez niego hermeneutyka soborowego dziedzictwa sama doczekała się różnych interpretacji. Gdzie w takim razie poszukiwać odpowiedniej hermeneutyki „hermeneutyki reformy”?
EN
The article focuses on the issue of proper interpretation of the Second Vatican Council’s inheritance. Benedict XVI believes a “hermeneutic of reform” is an alternative to a “hermeneutic of rupture”. Nevertheless, the expected “hermeneutic of reform” has received different interpretations. That’s why a relevant hermeneutic of the “hermeneutic of reform” must be applied. The author presumes that an issue of the Bible interpretation, which is in accord with the postulated by Benedict XVI “hermeneutic of faith”, is a practical expression of applying the “hermeneutic of reform”. Therefore, the „hermeneutic of reform” has been interpreted in the light of the “hermeneutic of faith”.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.