Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  hermeneutyka obrazu
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The oeuvre of a Jewish-Polish painter, Maurycy Gottlieb has been considered so far as strictly related with his biography and the questions of a national and religious identity. This perspective, much as it applies to extraordinarily significant issues, results in overlooking a picture as a picture, meaning the relation between a representation and a pictorial medium, i.e. surface. The relation of the both elements makes up a possibility to reveal a specific speech of painting, absent in other kinds of art. The question whether it comes to this revelation is an indispensable one. Especially in terms of the pictures whose contents derive from texts, as in the case of Gottlieb’s painting, Shylock and Jessica, which depicts characters of Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice. In this case the question must be also posed if the painting’s features, perceived as the painter’s original achievement – namely iconography, the scene of handing in the keys, and its composition, as well as depicting Shylock as a tender, painful father – should be perceived as a typical solution in view of various manifestations of reception of this work by Shakespeare. Originality and artistic significance of Gottlieb’s painting is revealed instead in the fact that the artist – with the aim of provoking an optical play between the representation and the pictorial surface – managed to come up with a visual equivalent of important and general, namely reaching beyond a narrative dimension of the scene, traits of relations between the drama characters. Referring to the question of identity, in consequence we can state that Gottlieb by means of his painting does not speak to us neither as a Jew, nor as a Pole, but as a painter.
EN
The text constitutes an attempt to look at the potential sources from which originates the hermeneutics of the image, one of the most important methodological proposals in contemporary art history, or even within the broadly understood science of the image. In addition to certain traditions in the study of art, the hermeneutics of the image referred, in a more or less overt manner, to various philosophical concepts from within the philosophy of art, taking them as the foundation for, among others, its distinctive concept of the ontology of an artwork, the ways of recognising and describing it, as well as the aims of interpreting and elucidating the image. The article also draws attention to the paradoxical fact of the hermeneutic philosophy of the image being rooted in the currents of Romantic art theory but simultaneously displaying a critical approach to the Romantic legacy.
PL
Tekst jest próbą przyjrzenia się potencjalnym źródłom, z których wyrosła hermeneutyka obrazu, jedna z ważniejszych propozycji metodologicznych we współczesnej historii sztuki czy nawet w obrębie szeroko zakrojonej nauki o obrazie. Hermeneutyka obrazu, oprócz określonych tradycji w badaniach nad sztuką, nawiązywała również, w sposób mniej czy bardziej jawny, do rozmaitych koncepcji filozoficznych w obrębie filozofii sztuki, fundując na nich między innymi charakterystyczną dla siebie ideę ontologii dzieła, sposoby jego poznawania i opisywania, a także cele interpretacji i wykładni obrazu. W artykule zwrócono ponadto uwagę na paradoksalne zakorzenienie hermeneutycznej filozofii obrazu w nurtach romantycznej teorii sztuki, przy jednoczesnym krytycznym podejściu do spuścizny romantycznej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.