Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 11

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  identity status
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Nowadays, it is young adults, not adolescents, who face the challenge of determining their own identity. This process, compared to previous generations, takes place in qualitatively different conditions. Moreover, the current attributes of an adult have become obsolete. For this reason, making the vision of oneself reality may be associated with various difficulties. The root of the failure to clarify identity is to be found in the original bond with the guardian and in all experiences that disrupt attachment. Among these types of experiences, relational trauma and parentification are worth mentioning. Relational trauma can be said to be when a child experiences repeated neglect in the context of a close relationship. A similar phenomenon is parentification.The aim of the research is to check 1) whether there are significant differences between the identified identity statuses and 2) whether the variables (attachment style, experience of parentification and relational trauma) differentiate the identity status in the period of emergingadulthood. Three identity statuses are distinguished: Identity of anxiety type (N = 23), identity of diffuse type (N = 30) and identity of type achieved (N = 43). Each type differs in terms of both the experiences and the severity of the identity dimensions.
PL
The article presents selected results of research conducted in a group of students – 136 from lower secondary schools and 180 from upper secondary schools in Wielkopolska Voivodeship. Thanks to data clustering analysis, the following identity statuses were identified: carefree diffusion (33%), moratorium (22%), interception (14%) and achievement (31%). Studies indicated a statistically significant correlation between emotion regulation in the range of nonacceptance of emotional responses and limited access to emotion regulation strategies with all identity dimensions. The research analysis also indicated a statistically significant correlation between social support and mainly following identity dimensions: exploration in breadth, exploration in depth and identification with commitment. Statistically significant differences in emotion regulation and social support dimensions were found between participants characterized by individual statuses.
EN
The article presents selected results of research conducted in a group of students – 136 from lower secondary schools and 180 from upper secondary schools in Wielkopolska Voivodeship. Thanks to data clustering analysis, the following identity statuses were identified: carefree diffusion (33%), moratorium (22%), interception (14%) and achievement (31%). Studies indicated a statistically significant correlation between emotion regulation in the range of nonacceptance of emotional responses and limited access to emotion regulation strategies with all identity dimensions. The research analysis also indicated a statistically significant correlation between social support and mainly following identity dimensions: exploration in breadth, exploration in depth and identification with commitment. Statistically significant differences in emotion regulation and social support dimensions were found between participants characterized by individual statuses.
EN
The article presents the results of a study investigating the links between emotion regulation and identity. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the two variables. On the basis of neo-eriksonian theories, an attempt to specify the role of emotion regulation in the process of identity formation was made. The study involved 849 people (544 women, 304 men) aged 14-25. The participants attended six types of schools: lower secondary school, basic vocational school, technical upper secondary school, general upper secondary school, post-secondary school, and university. The research was conducted with the use of two questionnaires: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Dimensions of Identity Development Scale (DIDS). The analysis of the results points to a partial confirmation of the assumed hypotheses about the differences between people with different identity statuses in respect of the six investigated dimensions of emotion regulation. Also, the hypotheses about the links between the dimensions of emotion regulation and dimensions of identity in the subgroups with different identity statuses were partially confirmed.
EN
The aim of the study was to present the relationship between attachment styles and the dimensions of identity development. The theoretical framework of current research constitutes: Attachment Theory by Bowlby (2007) as well as his followers (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991), and a concept of Identity Development in the Identity Status Paradigm (Brzezińska & Piotrowski, 2010), which is based on the Psychosocial Development Theory by Erikson (1997). The participants were 109 students from different universities and classes. The experiment was questionnairebased – the participants filled out the Dimensions of Identity Development Scale and the Relationship Questionnaire. The results suggested a relationship between anxious-avoidant and preoccupied attachment styles and specific dimensions of identity development.
EN
Celem prezentowanych analiz było ukazanie związku między czterema statusami tożsamości w ujęciu Jamesa Marcii a posiadaniem partnera życiowego w okresie wczesnej dorosłości. Przeprowadzono badania z udziałem 452 osób (307 kobiet i 145 mężczyzn) w wieku od 20 do 35 lat. Badania ujawniły, że wśród osób badanych dominują osoby o tożsamości moratoryjnej oraz tożsamości rozproszonej w obszarze ideologicznym, jak i interpersonalnym. Otrzymane wyniki wskazują na brak różnic w zakresie statusów tożsamości w obszarze ideologicznym i interpersonalnym między osobami posiadającymi i nie posiadającymi partnera życiowego, a zatem status tożsamości nie stanowił czynnika różnicującego osoby żyjące w pojedynkę i w związku. Jednocześnie przeprowadzane analizy sugerują, że osoby badane rozwiązują kryzysy tożsamości i intymności równocześnie.
EN
The paper presents a draft model of the relationship between shame, treated as one of the self-conscious emotions, and the identity formation process. Two main concepts of shame have been discussed here: shame as an adaptive emotion, in line with the evolutionary approach, and as a maladaptive emotion (in contrast to guilt), according to cognitive attribution theory. The main thesis of this paper states that shame has an essential, both constructive and maladaptive, importance for identity development and that its effect is indirect as it works through the mechanisms of emotion regulation. The destructive and disrupting influence of shame is not an immanent feature of this emotion, but it is a consequence of malfunctioning mechanisms of shame regulation. The association of shame with identity formation relates to the exploration dimensions – exploration in breadth, exploration in depth and ruminative exploration, as well as to commitment making and identification with commitment.
EN
In the paper we present a draft of a model capturing the relationship between shame and the identity development process. We discuss two main concepts of shame: shame as an adaptive emotion, according to the evolutionary approach, and as a maladaptive emotion, according to the cognitive attribution theory. Our main thesis states that shame has an essential, both constructive and maladaptive importance for identity development, and this effect is indirect, through the mechanisms of regulating emotions. The destructive and disrupting value of shame is not an immanent feature of this emotion, but a consequence of malfunctioning mechanisms of shame regulation. The association of shame with identity formation relates to the dimensions of exploration: in breadth, in depth and ruminative, as well as to commitment making and identification with commitment. People with a high level of shame proneness are more sensitive to information and assessment coming from signifi cant others from their nearest social environment and more self-critical. This may contribute to the increasing discrepancy or dissonance between the possessed and the desired or socially expected identity. This may also activate mechanisms of identity change and affect its relative stability.
EN
The aim of the study was to present the relationship between attachment styles and the dimensions of identity development. The theoretical framework of current research constitutes: Attachment Theory by Bowlby (2007) as well as his followers (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991), and a concept of Identity Development in the Identity Status Paradigm (Brzezińska & Piotrowski, 2010), which is based on the Psychosocial Development Theory by Erikson (1997). The participants were 109 students from different universities and classes. The experiment was questionnairebased – the participants filled out the Dimensions of Identity Development Scale and the Relationship Questionnaire. The results suggested a relationship between anxious-avoidant and preoccupied attachment styles and specific dimensions of identity development.
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie wyników badania, wskazujących na istnienie związków pomiędzy stylami przywiązania a wymiarami rozwoju tożsamości. Ramę teoretyczną dla tej pracy stanowi z jednej strony teoria przywiązania w ujęciu zarówno Johna Bowlby’ego (2007), jak i kontynuatorów jego pracy (Bartholomew, Horowitz, 1991) oraz koncepcja rozwoju tożsamości w paradygmacie statusów tożsamości (Brzezińska, Piotrowski, 2010) wywodząca się z teorii rozwoju psychospołecznego Erika Eriksona (1997). Przebadano 109 studentów, studiujących na różnych uczelniach i kierunkach. Badanie miało charakter kwestionariuszowy – badani wypełniali Skalę Wymiarów Rozwoju Tożsamości (DIDS) oraz Skale Związków (RQ). Wyniki badań wykazały istnienie związków pomiędzy stylami przywiązania lękowo-unikającym i zaabsorbowanym a specyficznymi wymiarami rozwoju tożsamości.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.