Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  idiokultura
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article attempts to provide answers to the questions concerning the use, understanding and ontological status of connotation in the light of the anthropocentric theory of languages. The problems are examined on three levels: terminological, semantic and ontological. The problem on the level of terminology is largely attributed to the ambiguous use of the term connotation in the field of linguistics, i.e. from the point of view of logic, where connotation is understood as intension, and from the linguistic point of view, where connotation is identified as additional meaning. This leads to different understandings of connotation within the remit of semantics as regards its ‘relations' with denotation. A differentiation made between connotation viewed as an expression and connotation proper, together with an attempt to explain the latter's actual role in generating idiolectal meaning, constitutes a platform for further considerations of the problem of connotation on the level of ontology.
EN
The article discusses certain aspects of human communication viewed from the perspective of the anthropocentric language theory developed by F. Grucza. In the first part the author presents general principles of the anthropocentric language theory and explains the ontological status of language as an inherent attribute of a man. Along with two other inherent attributes of homo sapiens, i.e. its individual knowledge and culture, these three components form a triad of an integral cognitive device of a man. One of the key points of this theory consists in the elucidation of commonly mistaken comprehension of the so-called knowledge transfer allegedly occurring during the communication process. This trans­fer may only occur with reference to the stream of signs and not to the knowledge itself. The second part of the article is concerned with the process of specialist communication and certain determinant factors of successful communication. Among the underlying factors discussed are some linguistic as well as extra-linguistic skills whose classification is proposed by the author on the basis of the anthro­pocentric language theory.
EN
The present paper aims at defining, on the background of the institutionalization of Cultural Studies at Polish and German Universities and the animated discussion about its status as a new autonomous scientific discipline, the specific object, the goals and the methods of Cultural Science („Kulturwissenschaft") from the point of view of F. Grucza's Anthropocentric Theory of Language. According to the assumptions of this theory „Culture", like „Language", has to be to considered in the scientific investigation primarily as a set of specific human properties founded through a particular competence (knowledge and ability) which enable the subject to realize cultural expressions (texts, works, symbols, rituals, styles, forms of behavior); these „realizations" are also the object of the Anthropocentric Theory of Culture, anyway always in relationship to the acting subject. Anthropocentric Theory of Culture aims at investigating its objects in a diachronic and synchronic way and attempts to gain anagnostic, diagnostic and prognostic explicative and descriptive knowledge.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.